JSFA

Article http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijfsa.2023.06.022

Transactions Costs Approach and Application to Vertical Coordination Arrangements in Moroccan Apple Marketing

TOTAL VIEWS: 1453

El Houssain Bouichou1,2,*, Aziz Fadlaoui2, Abdelghani Bouayad3, Khalil Allali1

1Department of Economic and Social Sciences Applied to Agriculture, Agronomic and Veterinary Institute Hassan II, Madinat Al Irfane, Morocco.

2Management of Natural Resources, Economics and Sociology and Quality Research Unit, Regional Agricultural Research Center of Meknes, National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRA), Morocco.

3Laboratory for Social Sciences and Economics, Faculty of Economic and Social Legal Sciences, Moulay Ismail University, Morocco.

*Corresponding author: El Houssain Bouichou

Published: July 30,2023

Abstract

In Morocco, agricultural aggregation projects (AAP) have been launched since a decade as being a form of vertical coordination aimed at correcting the marketing failure associated with spot markets arising due to information asymmetry as being behind the risks in marketing decision-making. AAP is considered to be the keystone of national agriculture, making it possible to overcome the diffi-culties linked to the size of farms. However, the scale of the transaction costs in agricultural aggregation projects (AAP) of the local apple producers remains so far less understood. The objective of this study is to investigate whether ex-ante costs of negotiating an AAP and the expost costs influence the adoption of relational transactions in Moroccan agricultural marketing and measure the social costs that are not common in previous studies, thus contributing to the development of literature. The study revealed that the transaction costs of this project total approximately 1207600 MAD. In this study, the abovementioned issues were investigated using a propensity score matching technique through a binary probit model to examine the transaction costs faced by apple producers members in agricultural aggregation projects and non-aggregated members, and therefore investigate the role of contract arrangements in reducing the aforementioned costs using a questionnaire-based survey in Atlas Mountains of Morocco. Results showed that the cost of negotiation and enforcement costs were revealed as the main variables which impede apple producers’ participation in aggregation marketing, while the costs related to information search, harvesting, and transportation were the main obstacles to the participation of the non-aggregated members in the traditional spot market. Results also highlighted that the large-scale producers would be highly advantageous in aggregation projects compared to smallholder farmers.

References

[1] Akesbi, N. (2014). Which agricultural policy for which food security in Morocco? In Seasonal Workers in Mediterranean Agriculture (pp. 185-192). Routledge.

[2] El Houssain, B.; Fadlaoui, A.; Allali, K.; Arrach, R. Contract Farming in the Morocco Cereal Sector: Contract Clauses, Ambiguity, and Opportunism. Int. J. Agric. Econ. 2019, 4, 245.

[3] Bouichou, E. H., Abdoulaye, T., Allali, K., Bouayad, A., & Fadlaoui, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial intention among rural youth in Moroccan Agricultural Cooperatives: the future of rural entrepreneurship. Sustainability, 13(16), 9247.

[4] Abdulai, Y., & Al-hassan, S. (2016). Effects of Contract Farming On Small-Holder Soybean Farmers’ Income in the Eastern Corridor of the Northern Region, Ghana.

[5] Mulatu, G., Haji, J., Legesse, B., & Ketema, M. (2017). Impact of participation in vegetables’ contract farming on house-hold’s income in the Central Rift valley of Ethiopia. American Journal of Rural Development, 5(4), 90-96.

[6] Pan, W., & Bai, H. (2018). Propensity score methods for causal inference: an overview. Behaviormetrika, 45(2), 317-334.

[7] Coase, R. (1952). H., 1937, The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4(16), 386405.

[8] Ray, N., Clarke, G., & Waley, P. (2021). The impact of contract farming on the welfare and livelihoods of farmers: A village case study from West Bengal. Journal of Rural Studies, 86, 127-135.

[9] Coase, R. H. (1990). Accounting and the theory of the firm. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12(1-3), 3-13.

[10] Riordan, M. H., & Williamson, O. E. (1985). Asset specificity and economic organization. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 3(4), 365-378.

[11] Frank, S. D., & Henderson, D. R. (1992). Transaction costs as determinants of vertical coordination in the US food industries. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(4), 941-950.

[12] Williamson, O. E. (1973). Markets and hierarchies: some elementary considerations. The American economic review, 63(2), 316-325.

[13] Januszewski Forbes, S., & Lederman, M. (2009). Adaptation and vertical integration in the airline industry. American Economic Review, 99(5), 1831-49. 

[14] Léger‐Bosch, C. (2019). Farmland tenure and transaction costs: Public and collectively owned land vs conventional coor-dination mechanisms in France. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 67(3), 283-301. 

[15] Simshauser. (2021). Vertical integration, peaking plant commitments and the role of credit quality in energy-only markets. Energy Economics, 104, 105612. 63(2), 316-325.

[16] Royer, A. (2011). Transaction costs in milk marketing: A comparison between Canada and Great Britain. Agricultural Economics, 42(2), 171-182.

[17] Coulter, J., Goodland, A., Tallontire, A., & Stringfellow, R. (1999). Marrying farmer cooperation and contract farming for service provision in a liberalising sub-Saharan Africa. Natural resource perspectives, 48, 1-4.

[18] Bijman, J. (2008). Contract farming in developing countries: an overview.

[19] Nsimbila, P. M. (2021). Determinants of Contract Farming Adoption and its Impact on Productivity of Smallholder Cotton Producers in Tanzania. International Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, 6(2), 55-69.

[20] Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. The journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233-261.

[21] Williamson, O. E. (1989). Transaction cost economics. Handbook of industrial organization, 1, 135-182

[22] Bwalya, R., Mugisha, J., & Hyuha, T. (2013). Transaction costs and smallholder household access to maize markets in Zambia. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 5(9), 328-336.

[23] Hobbs, J. E. (1997). Measuring the importance of transaction costs in cattle marketing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(4), 1083-1095.

[24] Haut-Commissariat au Plan Maroc, "Présentation de la région Draa

https://www.hcp.ma/draa-tafilalet/Presentation-de-la-region-de-Draa-Tafilalet_a4.html, accessed on 5 November 2021.

[25] Valentová, M., Lízal, L., & Knápek, J. (2018). Designing energy efficiency subsidy programmes: The factors of transaction costs. Energy Policy, 120, 382-391.

[26] Zhao, Z. (2008). Sensitivity of propensity score methods to the specifications. Economics Letters, 98(3), 309-319.

[27] Maertens, M., & Velde, K. V. (2017). Contract farming in staple food chains: The case of rice in Benin. World Development, 95, 73-87.

[28] D’Alberto, R., Zavalloni, M., Raggi, M., & Viaggi, D. (2018). AES impact evaluation with integrated farm data: Combining statistical matching and propensity score matching. Sustainability, 10(11), 4320.

[29] Gershon, O., Matthew, O., Osuagwu, E., Osabohien, R., Ekhator-Mobayode, U. E., & Osabuohien, E. (2020). Household access to agricultural credit and agricultural production in Nigeria: A propensity score matching model. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 23(1), 1-11.

[30] Pufahl, A., & Weiss, C. (2007). Evaluating the effects of farm programs: Results from propensity score.

[31] Alwarritzi, W., Nanseki, T., & Chomei, Y. (2016). Impact of oil palm expansion on farmers' crop income and poverty reduction in Indonesia: An application of propensity score matching. J Agric Sci, 8(1), 119-31.

[32] Lijia, W., & Xuexi, H. (2014). Transaction costs comparison between cooperatives and conventional apple producers: A case study of Northwestern China. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 85(2), 233-255.

[33] Gujarati, D. N., Porter, D. C., & Gunasekar, S. (2012). Basic econometrics. Tata mcgraw-hill education.

[34] Miyata, S., Minot, N., & Hu, D. (2009). Impact of contract farming on income: linking small farmers, packers, and super-markets in China. World development, 37(11), 1781-1790.

[35] Khan, M. F., Nakano, Y., & Kurosaki, T. (2019). Impact of contract farming on land productivity and income of maize and potato growers in Pakistan. Food Policy, 85, 28-39.

[36] Karing'u, K. N., Isaboke, H. N., & Ndirangu, S. N. (2020). Transaction costs and participation in avocado export marketing in Murang’a County, Kenya. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies.

[37] Adepoju, A.O., Oyegoke, O., and Amusan, A. (2019). “Productivity and market participation of Fluted pumpkin farmers under tropical conditions”, International Journal of Vegetable Science, pp. 1-10.

[38] Minkoua Nzie, J. R., Bidogeza, J. C., & Azinwi Ngum, N. (2018). Mobile phone use, transaction costs, and price: Evidence from rural vegetable farmers in Cameroon. Journal of African Business, 19(3), 323-342.

[39] Ton, G., Vellema, W., Desiere, S., Weituschat, S., & D'Haese, M. (2018). Contract farming for improving smallholder incomes: What can we learn from effectiveness studies? World Development, 104, 46-64.

[40] Jagwe, J. N., & Machethe, C. (2011). Effects of transaction costs on choice of selling point: a case of smallholder banana growers in the Great Lakes region of Central Africa. Agrekon, 50(3), 109-123.

[41] Mabuza, M. L., Ortmann, G., & Wale, E. (2014). Effects of transaction costs on mushroom producers' choice of marketing channels: implications for access to agricultural markets in Swaziland. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 17(2), 207-219.

[42] Chowdhury, S. K. (2002, August). Access to information, transaction costs and marketing choice of rural households between middlemen and direct buyers in Bangladesh. In Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2002 (No. 50). Royal Economic Society.

[43] Ba, H. A., de Mey, Y., Thoron, S., & Demont, M. (2019). Inclusiveness of contract farming along the vertical coordination continuum: Evidence from the Vietnamese rice sector. Land use policy, 87, 104050.

[44] Ren, Y., Peng, Y., Campos, B. C., & Li, H. (2021). The effect of contract farming on the environmentally sustainable production of rice in China. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, 1381-1395.

[45] Zhong, Z., Zhang, C., Jia, F., & Bijman, J. (2018). Vertical coordination and cooperative member benefits: Case studies of four dairy farmers’ cooperatives in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 2266-2277.

[46] Guo, H., Jolly, R. W., & Zhu, J. (2007). Contract farming in China: perspectives of farm households and agribusiness firms. Comparative Economic Studies, 49(2), 285-312.

[47] Macharia, M. A., Mshenga, P. M., Ngigi, M., Gido, O. E., & Kiprop, K. J. (2014). Effect of transaction costs on smallholder maize market participation: Case of Kwanza District, Trans Nzoia County, Kenya. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 3(4), 715-725.

[48] Ma, W., Renwick, A., Yuan, P., & Ratna, N. (2018). Agricultural cooperative membership and technical efficiency of apple farmers in China: An analysis accounting for selectivity bias. Food Policy, 81, 122-132.

[49] Osebeyo, S. O., & Aye, G. C. (2014). Transaction costs and marketing decision: a case study of smallholder tomato farmers in Makurdi, Nigeria. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 2(1), 333-340.

How to cite this paper

Transactions Costs Approach and Application to Vertical Coordination Arrangements in Moroccan Apple Marketing

How to cite this paper: El Houssain Bouichou, Aziz Fadlaoui, Abdelghani Bouayad, Khalil Allali(2023) Transactions Costs Approach and Application to Vertical Coordination Arrangements in Moroccan Apple Marketing. International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture7(2), 311-325.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijfsa.2023.06.022