Watanabe, M., et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Clinical practice guidelines on the Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy, 2020 - Secondary publication. J Orthop Sci, 2022.
 Nouri, A., et al. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Epidemiology, Genetics, and Pathogenesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2015. 40(12): p. E675-93.
 Lannon, M. and E. Kachur. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Clinical Presentation, Assessment, and Natural History. J Clin Med, 2021. 10(16).
 Yarbrough, C.K., et al. The natural history and clinical presentation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Adv Orthop, 2012. 2012: p. 480643.
 Zhang, R.J., et al. Clinical features and surgical outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in patients of different ages: a retrospective study. Spinal Cord, 2018. 56(1): pp. 7-13.
 Watanabe, M., et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Clinical practice guidelines on the Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy, 2020 - Secondary publication. J Orthop Sci, 2023. 28(1): p. 1-45.
 Chen, Y.C., et al. Recent advances in the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: bibliometric analysis and surgical perspectives. J Neurosurg Spine, 2019. 31(3): p. 299-309.
 McCormick, J.R., et al. Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Guide to Diagnosis and Management. J Am Board Fam Med, 2020. 33(2): p. 303-313.
 Callanan, G. and K.E. Radcliff, Cervical Total Disc Replacement: Long-Term Outcomes. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 2021. 32(4): p. 461-472.
 Wahood, W., et al. Artificial Discs in Cervical Disc Replacement: A Meta-Analysis for Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes. World Neurosurg, 2020. 134: p. 598-613.e5.
 White, A.A. and M.M. Panjabi. Biomechanical considerations in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1988. 13(7): p. 856-60.
 Baptiste, D.C. and M.G. Fehlings. Pathophysiology of cervical myelopathy. Spine J, 2006. 6(6 Suppl): p. 190s-197s.
 Raj, P.P. Intervertebral disc: anatomy-physiology-pathophysiology-treatment. Pain Pract, 2008. 8(1): p. 18-44.
 Feng, C., et al. Disc cell senescence in intervertebral disc degeneration: Causes and molecular pathways. Cell Cycle, 2016. 15(13): p. 1674-84.
 Roberts, S., et al. Matrix metalloproteinases and aggrecanase: their role in disorders of the human intervertebral disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2000. 25(23): p. 3005-13.
 Park, M.S., et al. Facet joint degeneration of the cervical spine: a computed tomographic analysis of 320 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2014. 39(12): p. E713-8.
 Jaumard, N.V., W.C. Welch, and B.A. Winkelstein. Spinal facet joint biomechanics and mechanotransduction in normal, injury and degenerative conditions. J Biomech Eng, 2011. 133(7): p. 071010.
 Karadimas, S.K., et al. Pathophysiology and natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2013. 38(22 Suppl 1): p. S21-36.
 Badhiwala, J.H., et al. Degenerative cervical myelopathy—update and future directions. Nat Rev Neurol, 2020. 16(2): p. 108-124.
 Dalbayrak, S., et al., The contribution of cervical dynamic magnetic resonance imaging to the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Turk Neurosurg, 2015. 25(1): p. 36-42.
 Lee, J.B., et al. Influence of dynamic neck motion on the clinical usefulness of multi-positional MRI in cervical degenerative spondylosis. Eur Spine J, 2021. 30(6): p. 1542-1550.
 Tykocki, T., J. du Plessis, and G. Wynne-Jones. Correlation between the severity of myelopathy and cervical morphometric parameters on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2018. 160(6): p. 1251-1258.
 Lee, Y., S.Y. Kim, and K. Kim. A Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Changes in Severity of Cervical Spinal Stenosis in Flexion and Extension. Ann Rehabil Med, 2018. 42(4): p. 584-590.
 Muhle, C., et al. Classification system based on kinematic MR imaging in cervical spondylitic myelopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 1998. 19(9): p. 1763-71.
 Muhle, C., et al. Dynamic changes of the spinal canal in patients with cervical spondylosis at flexion and extension using magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol, 1998. 33(8): p. 444-9.
 Qi, Q., et al. A New Diagnostic Medium for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Dynamic Somatosensory Evoked Potentials. World Neurosurg, 2020. 133: p. e225-e232.
 Yu, Z., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic X-ray's correlations with dynamic electrophysiological findings in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Neurol, 2020. 20(1): p. 367.
 Morishita, Y., et al. Dynamic somatosensory evoked potentials to determine electrophysiological effects on the spinal cord during cervical spine extension: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine, 2013. 19(3): p. 288-92.
 Yu, Z., et al. Spinal Cord Parenchyma Vascular Redistribution Underlies Hemodynamic and Neurophysiological Changes at Dynamic Neck Positions in Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Front Neuroanat, 2021. 15: p. 729482.
 Morris, S.H., et al. Validity of transcranial motor evoked potentials as early indicators of neural compromise in rat model of spinal cord compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2015. 40(8): p. E492-7.
 Morris, S.H., J.J. Howard, and R. El-Hawary Comparison of Motor-Evoked Potentials Versus Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials as Early Indicators of Neural Compromise in Rat Model of Spinal Cord Compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2017. 42(6): p. E326-e331.
 Lee, J.B., et al. Difference of Dynamic Morphometric Changes Between in Patients with Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament and Patients with Cervical Spondylosis: Assessment by Cervical Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging. World Neurosurg, 2019. 123: p. e566-e573.
 Muhle, C., et al. Biomechanical aspects of the subarachnoid space and cervical cord in healthy individuals examined with kinematic magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1998. 23(5): p. 556-67.
 Stamm, S., et al. Dynamic MRI Reveals Soft-Tissue Compression Causing Progressive Myelopathy in Postlaminectomy Patients: A Report of Three Cases. JBJS Case Connect, 2013. 3(1): p. e17.
 Breig, A., I. Turnbull, and O. Hassler. Effects of mechanical stresses on the spinal cord in cervical spondylosis. A study on fresh cadaver material. J Neurosurg, 1966. 25(1): p. 45-56.
 Jha, S.C., M. Miyazaki, and H. Tsumura. Kinetic change of spinal cord compression on flexion-extension magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spine. Clin Neurol Neurosurg, 2018. 174: p. 86-91.
 Hattou, L., et al. Dynamic cervical myelopathy in young adults. Eur Spine J, 2014. 23(7): p. 1515-22.
 Yu, Z., et al. Patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy exhibit neurophysiological improvement upon extension and flexion: a retrospective cohort study with a minimum 1-year follow-up. BMC Neurol, 2022. 22(1): p. 110.
 Cloward, R.B. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg, 1958. 15(6): p. 602-17.
 Smith, G.W. and R.A. Robinson. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1958. 40-a(3): p. 607-24.
 D'Souza, M., et al. Graft Materials and Biologics for Spinal Interbody Fusion. Biomedicines, 2019. 7(4).
 Ho-Shui-Ling, A., et al. Bone regeneration strategies: Engineered scaffolds, bioactive molecules and stem cells current stage and future perspectives. Biomaterials, 2018. 180: p. 143-162.
 Abjornson, C., et al. ISASS Recommendations and Coverage Criteria for Bone Graft Substitutes used in Spinal Surgery. Int J Spine Surg, 2018. 12(6): p. 757-771.
 Lebl, D.R. and C.M. Bono. Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2015. 23(11): p. 648-60.
 Qi, M., et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of single-level cervical spondylosis: a 10-year follow-up study. Spine J, 2022.
 Luo, C.A., et al. The surgical outcome of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in myelopathic elderly and younger patients. Sci Rep, 2022. 12(1): p. 4495.
 Li, Y., et al. Comparison of Multilevel Cervical Disc Replacement and Multilevel Anterior Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review of Biomechanical and Clinical Evidence. World Neurosurg, 2018. 116: p. 94-104.
 Chang, C.J., et al. Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus artificial disc replacement for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine, 2022: p. 1-10.
 Epstein, N.E. A Review of Complication Rates for Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion (ACDF). Surg Neurol Int, 2019. 10: p. 100.
 Yerneni, K., et al. Safety of Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neurosurgery, 2020. 86(1): p. 30-45.
 Yew, A.Y., et al. Quantitative Risk Factor Analysis of Postoperative Dysphagia after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) Using the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10). Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2019. 44(2): p. E82-e88.
 Liu, J., et al. Risk factors and preventative measures of early and persistent dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review. Eur Spine J, 2018. 27(6): p. 1209-1218.
 Alhashash, M., M. Shousha, and H. Boehm. Adjacent Segment Disease after Cervical Spine Fusion: Evaluation of a 70 Patient Long-Term Follow-Up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2018. 43(9): p. 605-609.
 Yang, W., et al. Superiority of 2-Level Total Disk Replacement Using a Cervical Disk Prosthesis Versus Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion. Orthopedics, 2018. 41(6): p. 344-350.
 Guo, S., et al. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Sagittal Alignment After Different Levels of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: From One-level to Three-level. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2021. 46(3): p. E153-e160.
 Liu, Y., et al. Comparative analysis of complications of different reconstructive techniques following anterior decompression for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J, 2012. 21(12): p. 2428-35.
 Louie, P.K., V.M. Nemani, and J.A. Leveque. Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Case Presentation With Surgical Technique Demonstration and Review of Literature. Clin Spine Surg, 2022. 35(10): p. 440-446.
 Wang, T., et al. Comparison of Two Anterior Reconstructive Techniques in the Treatment of 3-Level and 4 Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Meta-analysis of Last Decade. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil, 2022. 13: p. 21514593221124415.
 Banno, F., et al. Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Insights from a National Registry. World Neurosurg, 2019. 132: p. e852-e861.
 Wei, F., et al. A prospective randomized cohort study on 3D-printed artificial vertebral body in single-level anterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Ann Transl Med, 2020. 8(17): p. 1070.
 Amelot, A., M. Colman, and J.E. Loret. Vertebral body replacement using patient-specific three-dimensional-printed polymer implants in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an encouraging preliminary report. Spine J, 2018. 18(5): p. 892-899.
 Reitz, H. and M.J. Joubert. Intractable Headache and Cervico-Brachialgia Treated by Complete Replacement of Cervical Intervertebral Discs with a Metal Prosthesis. S Afr Med J, 1964. 38: p. 881-4.
 He, J., et al. Bibliometric and visualized analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles on anterior cervical surgery. EFORT Open Rev, 2021. 6(12): p. 1203-1213.
 Witiw, C.D., et al. Cervical disc replacement: examining "real-world" utilization of an emerging technology. J Neurosurg Spine, 2020: p. 1-7.
 DiAngelo, D.J., et al. In vitro biomechanics of cervical disc arthroplasty with the ProDisc-C total disc implant. Neurosurg Focus, 2004. 17(3): p. E7.
 Havey, R.M., et al. Motion response of a polycrystalline diamond adaptive axis of rotation cervical total disc arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2019. 62: p. 34-41.
 Bydon, M., et al. Cervical Total Disc Replacement: Food and Drug Administration-Approved Devices. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 2021. 32(4): p. 425-435.
 Zhou, F., et al. Quantitative analysis of the correlation between preoperative cervical degeneration and postoperative heterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement: minimum 10-year follow-up data. J Neurosurg Spine, 2020: p. 1-6.
 Nunley, P., K.F.V. Schouwen, and M. Stone. Cervical Total Disc Replacement: Indications and Technique. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 2021. 32(4): p. 419-424.
 Wang, X., et al. Effect of Disc Height and Degree of Distraction on Heterotopic Ossification After Cervical Disc Replacement. World Neurosurg, 2021. 145: p. e100-e107.
 Tu, T.H., et al. Multilevel cervical disc arthroplasty: a review of optimal surgical management and future directions. J Neurosurg Spine, 2023. 38(3): p. 372-381.
 Badhiwala, J.H., et al. Cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of rates of adjacent-level surgery to 7-year follow-up. J Spine Surg, 2020. 6(1): p. 217-232.
 Li, Z., et al. Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Interventions for Treating Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy via Anterior Approach: A Network Meta-Analysis. Pain Physician, 2019. 22(4): p. E275-e286.
 Pehlivanoglu, T., et al. Clinical and Radiographic Outcome of Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Undergoing Total Disc Replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2019. 44(20): p. 1403-1411.
 Peng, Z., et al. A meta-analysis comparing the short- and mid- to long-term outcomes of artificial cervical disc replacement(ACDR) with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease. Int Orthop, 2022. 46(7): p. 1609-1625.
 Ghobrial, G.M., et al. Symptomatic Adjacent Level Disease Requiring Surgery: Analysis of 10-Year Results From a Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial Comparing Cervical Disc Arthroplasty to Anterior Cervical Fusion. Neurosurgery, 2019. 84(2): p. 347-354.
 Price, R.L., D. Coric, and W.Z. Ray. Cervical Total Disc Replacement: Complications and Complication Avoidance. Neurosurg Clin N Am, 2021. 32(4): p. 473-481.
 Shen, Y.W., et al. The Effect of Preoperative Cervical Spondylosis on Heterotopic Ossification After Cervical Disc Replacement. Global Spine J, 2022: p. 21925682221094265.
 Li, G., et al. Postoperative Heterotopic Ossification After Cervical Disc Replacement Is Likely a Reflection of the Degeneration Process. World Neurosurg, 2019. 125: p. e1063-e1068.
 Tian, Y., et al. [A long-term follow-up study on the occurrence of heterotopic ossification after artificial cervical disc replacement with Discover disc]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, 2020. 100(45): p. 3584-3589.
 Bajamal, A.H., et al. Posterior Surgical Techniques for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: WFNS Spine Committee Recom-mendations. Neurospine, 2019. 16(3): p. 421-434.
 Jain, A., et al. Does Segmental Kyphosis Affect Surgical Outcome after a Posterior Decompressive Laminectomy in Multiseg-mental Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy? Asian Spine J, 2017. 11(1): p. 24-30.
 Ghogawala, Z., et al. Effect of Ventral vs Dorsal Spinal Surgery on Patient-Reported Physical Functioning in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama, 2021. 325(10): p. 942-951.
 Rissanen, A., et al. Long-Term Follow-Up After Cervical Laminectomy without Fusion for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. World Neurosurg, 2022. 167: p. e222-e235.
 Kurihara, K., et al. Effect of Minimally Invasive Selective Laminectomy for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy on Degenerative Spondylolisthesis. Clin Spine Surg, 2022. 35(1): p. E242-e247.
 Kotter, M.R.N., et al. Surgical Outcomes Following Laminectomy With Fusion Versus Laminectomy Alone in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2020. 45(24): p. 1696-1703.
 Badiee, R.K., et al. Preoperative Narcotic Use, Impaired Ambulation Status, and Increased Intraoperative Blood Loss Are Independent Risk Factors for Complications Following Posterior Cervical Laminectomy and Fusion Surgery. Neurospine, 2019. 16(3): p. 548-557.
 Hirabayashi, K., et al., Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1983. 8(7): p. 693-9.
 Sivaraman, A., et al. Skip laminectomy and laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study of clinical and radiologic outcomes. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2010. 23(2): p. 96-100.
 Wang, D.L., et al. The Anatomical and Biomechanical Superiority of Novel Posterior En Bloc Elevation Cervical Laminoplasty. Surg Innov, 2021. 28(5): p. 552-559.
 Chen, C., et al. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Modified Unilateral Open-door Laminoplasty with Posterior Muscle-Ligament Complex Preservation for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2019. 44(24): p. 1697-1704.
 Ghasemi, A.A. and B. Behfar. Outcome of laminoplasty in cervical spinal cord injury with stable spine. Asian J Neurosurg, 2016. 11(3): p. 282-6.
 Cho, S.K., et al. Cervical Laminoplasty: Indications, Surgical Considerations, and Clinical Outcomes. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2018. 26(7): p. e142-e152.
 Braly, B.A., et al. Operative treatment of cervical myelopathy: cervical laminoplasty. Adv Orthop, 2012. 2012: p. 508534.
 Wang, J., et al. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for treatment of multilevel cervical compressive myelopathy: an updated meta-analysis. Postgrad Med J, 2022. 98(1163): p. 680-688.
 Sayana, M.K., H. Jamil, and A. Poynton. Cervical laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy. Adv Orthop, 2011. 2011: p. 241729.
 Yuan, X., et al. Comparison of laminectomy and fusion vs laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore), 2019. 98(13): p. e14971.
 Singhatanadgige, W., et al. Outcomes following Laminoplasty or Laminectomy and Fusion in Patients with Myelopathy Caused by Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Systematic Review. Global Spine J, 2016. 6(7): p. 702-709.
 Chen, H., et al. Short-Term Outcomes of Anterior Fusion-Nonfusion Hybrid Surgery versus Posterior Cervical Laminoplasty in the Treatment of Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. World Neurosurg, 2018. 116: p. e1007-e1014.
 Zhang, J., et al. Comparative Study Between Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with ROI-C Cage and Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy without Spinal Stenosis. World Neurosurg, 2019. 121: p. e917-e924.
 Lee, J.J., et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel cervical laminoplasty versus three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2020. 10(11): p. 2112-2124.
 Lopez, W.Y., et al. Laminoplasty-an underutilized procedure for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J, 2021. 21(4): p. 571-577.
 McAfee, P.C., et al. One-stage anterior cervical decompression and posterior stabilization. A study of one hundred patients with a minimum of two years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1995. 77(12): p. 1791-800.
 König, S.A. and U. Spetzger. Surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy - indications for anterior, posterior or combined procedures for decompression and stabilisation. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2014. 156(2): p. 253-8; discussion 258.
 Zaveri, G.R. and N.P. Jaiswal. A Comparison of Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following Anterior, Posterior, and Combined Approaches for the Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Indian J Orthop, 2019. 53(4): p. 493-501.
 Schultz, K.D., Jr., et al. Single-stage anterior-posterior decompression and stabilization for complex cervical spine disorders. J Neurosurg, 2000. 93(2 Suppl): p. 214-21.
 Sun H L, et al. Characteristics and preventive measures of cervical spondylosis in young desk workers. Electronic journal of clinical medicine literature, 2017. 4(15): p. 2812-2813.
 Lv, B., et al. Analysis of Correlation Between Age and Cervical Facet Joint Degeneration and Modic Changes in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Med Sci Monit, 2019. 25: p. 7882-7888.
 Radcliff, K., J. Zigler, and J. Zigler. Costs of cervical disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of single-level cervical disc disease: an analysis of the Blue Health Intelligence database for acute and long-term costs and complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2015. 40(8): p. 521-9.
 Ding, C., et al. Comparison of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Orthop Belg, 2013. 79(3): p. 338-46.
 Aprato, A., et al. Heterotopic ossification in primary total hip arthroplasty: risk factor analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2023. 33(4): p. 1037-1041.
 Hui, N., et al. Cervical Total Disc Replacement and Heterotopic Ossification: A Review of Literature Outcomes and Biomechanics. Asian Spine J, 2021. 15(1): p. 127-137.
 Łęgosz, P., et al. Heterotopic Ossification: A Challenging Complication of Total Hip Arthroplasty: Risk Factors, Diagnosis, Prophylaxis, and Treatment. Biomed Res Int, 2019. 2019: p. 3860142.
 Jin, Y.J., et al. An analysis of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc arthroplasty: a novel morphologic classification of an ossified mass. Spine J, 2013. 13(4): p. 408-20.
 Kim, K.S. and D.H. Heo. Do Postoperative Biomechanical Changes Induce Heterotopic Ossification After Cervical Arthroplasty? A 5-Year Follow-up Study. Clin Spine Surg, 2016. 29(6): p. E309-13.
 Cho, Y.H., K.S. Kim, and Y.M. Kwon. Heterotopic Ossification after Cervical Arthroplasty with ProDisc-C: Time Course Radiographic Follow-up over 3 years. Korean J Spine, 2013. 10(1): p. 19-24.
 Ganbat, D., et al. Effect of mechanical loading on heterotopic ossification in cervical total disc replacement: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 2016. 15(5): p. 1191-9.
 Yang W X, et al. Effect of Bushen Shuji Granule on factors related to heterotopic ossification in ankylosing spondylitis. Chinese Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 2019. 34(09): p. 4405-4409.