JSFA

Article http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijfsa.2019.12.005

Effect of Prebiotic and Immunowall® as Feed Additive in Enzyme Activity, Intestinal Characteristic, and Broiler Performance

TOTAL VIEWS: 8013

Osfar Sjofjan 1,*, Eko Widodo 1, Halim Natsir 1, Fatmaoctavia S. 2, Riany G.S. 2

1 Lecturer of Animal Nutrition Department, Animal Husbandry Faculty, Brawijaya University.

2 Student of Animal Husbandry Faculty, Brawijaya University.

*Corresponding author: Osfar Sjofjan

Published: December 25,2019

Abstract

The research purpose was to determine the prebiotic and immunowall® effect as the feed additive on enzyme activity, intestinal characteristic, and broiler performance. The research method was used completely randomized design with 3 treatments and 8 replicates. The materials used for this research were 720 unsex day old chicks with Ross 308 strain with average body weight 43.34±1.20 g/head. The treatments used for research were dietary with T0 (basal feed), T1 (basal feed + 0.05% prebiotic at 1-13 days) and (basal feed + 0.05% immunowall® at 15-32 days), T2 (basal feed + 0.1% prebiotic at 1-13 days) and (basal feed + 0.05% immunowall® at 15-32 days) The parameters observed were enzyme activities (protease and amylase), intestinal characteristic (villus total and villus height), and performance (feed intake, body weight, feed conversion ratio, mortality, and production index broiler). The data analysis was the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and continued by Duncan Multiple Range Test. The results showed that using the prebiotic and immunowall® effect as feed additive has significant difference (P < 0.05) on enzyme activities (protease and amylase), intestinal characteristic (villus total and villus height), performance (final body weight and mortality) and significantly different (P < 0.01) (feed conversion, index production, and IOFC). The addition of 0.05% prebiotic and 0.05% immunowall® gave the best effect on enzyme activity, intestinal characteristic, and broiler performance.

References

Bahari, M.M. Mustadjab, N. Hanani, dan B.A. Nugroho. 2012. Analisis kontrak farming ayam broiler. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi. 30(2): 109-127.

Beski, S.S.M. and S.Y.T.A. Sardary. 2015. Effect of dietary supplementation of probiotic and symbiotic on broiler chicken hematology and intestinal integrity. Journal of Poultry Science. 14(1):31-36.

Daud, M. 2005. Performan ayam pedaging yang diberi prebiotik dan probiotik dalam ransum. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak. 5(2):76.

El-banna, H.A., H.Y. El-Zorba, Attia, and Abd. Elatif. 2010. Effect of probiotic, prebiotic, and symbiotic on broiler performance. World Appl. Sci. J. 11: 388-393.

Ermalia, A.A.U., O. Sjofjan, and I.H. Djunaidi. 2016. Evaluasi fermentasi dedak padi menggunakan cairan rumen dan implikasinya terhadap kecernaan pakan dan aktivitas enzim pada ayam pedaging. Tesis. Fakultas Peternakan. Universitas Brawijaya.

Ghiyasi, M., M. Rezaeiand, and H. Sayyaazadeh. 2007. Effect of prebiotic (fermacto) in low protein diet on performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chicks. Poultry Sci. 6(9): 661-665.

Hamsah. 2013. Respon usus dan karakteristik karkas pada ayam ras pedaging dengan berat badan awal berbeda dipuasakan setelah menetas. Skripsi. Fakultas Peternakan. Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar.

Haryati. 2011. Probiotik dan prebiotic sebagai pakan imbuhan non-ruminansia. Wartazoa. 14(1):31-39.

James, R.G. 2004. Modern livestock and poultry production. 7th edition. Thomson Delmar Learning Inc. FFA Activities. London.

Lesson, S. and J.D. Summer. 2000. Production and carcass characteristics of the broiler. Poultry Science. 59:786-798.

Ningrum, A.D., W. Busono, dan O. Sjofjan. 2016. Pengaruh level pemberian probiotik dalam pakan terhadap berat organ dalam dan karakteristik usus ayam pedaging. Skripsi. Fakultas Peternakan. Universitas Brawijaya.

Oyeleke, S.B. and Oduwole. 2009. Production of Amylase by bacteria isolated from a cassava waste dumpsite in Minna, Niger State, Nigeria. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 3(4):143-146.

Rofiq, M.N. 2003. Pengaruh pakan berbahan baku lokal terhadap performans vili usus ayam broiler. Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Indonesia. 5(5):190-194.

Sjofjan, O. 2003. Kajian probiotik (Aspergillus niger dan Bacillus spp) sebagai imbuhan ransum dan implikasi efeknya terhadap mikroflora usus serta penampilan produksi ayam petelur. Disertasi. Universitas Padjajaran. Bandung.

Sjofjan, O., E. Widodo, and V.A. Soffa. 2012. Pengaruh penggunaan fitobiotik dalam bentuk tanpa dan terenkapsulasi sebagai aditif pakan terhadap aktivitas enzim usus ayam pedaging. JIIP.

Sjofjan, O., M. H. Natsir, dan T. Ardianti. 2015. Efek penggunaan probiotik kultur campuran dalam air minum terhadap karakteristik dan mikroflora usus ayam petelur. J. Ilmiah Bio. 1:52-58.

Spearman, K.R. 2004. Effect of mannaoligosaccharide (MOS) supplementation on the immune status of mares and their foals. Thesis. University of Florida, USA.

Tantalo, S. 2009. Perbandingan performans dua strain broiler yang mengonsumsi air kunyit. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Peternakan. 13:146-152.

Wahyu, J. 2004. Ilmu Nutrisi Ternak Unggas. Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogjakarta.

Warisa, A.N. 2015. Pengaruh penambahan saccharomyces cerevisiae pada pakan sebagai prebiotik terhadap pertumbuhan bobot badan, konsumsi pakan, feed convertion ratio dan indeks performa broiler. Skripsi. Program Studi Kedokteran Hewan. Fakultas Kedokteran. Universitas Hassanudin. Makassar.

Xu, H. Marcotte, H. Brussow L. Svensson, and L. Yang. 2006. Survival enhancement of probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum CMU-FP002. Afr. J. Mic. 4.

How to cite this paper

Effect of Prebiotic and Immunowall® as Feed Additive in Enzyme Activity, Intestinal Characteristic, and Broiler Performance

How to cite this paper: Osfar, S., Eko, W., Halim, N., Fatmaoctavia, S., Riany, G.S. (2019) Effect of Prebiotic and Immunowall as Feed Additive in Enzyme Activity, Intestinal Characteristic, and Broiler Performance. International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture, 3(4), 292-298.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijfsa.2019.12.005