ER
Acceptability Level of Developed Material (SAI) Using ASSURE Model
TOTAL VIEWS: 17107
Abstract
The researchers developed a computer based platform (Stand Alone Instruction) using the ASSURE model which incorporates Robert Gagne’s events of instruction to assure effective use of media in instruction .The general problem of the study is to find out the acceptability level of the developed material using ASSURE model. Specifically, the acceptability level of the SAI is described as strongly acceptable in terms of con-tent, clarity, appeal and originality. The enhanced developed material was further en-hanced based on the recommendations and suggestions of the teacher and student re-spondents. The study is a creative research that uses mixed method which combines quantitative and qualitative techniques. The research study was carried out in two phases: The development of the SAI and the evaluation of the responses through the questionnaire which is adapted from Reyes and De Guia (2017) in order to determine the acceptability level of the SAI. The data were tabulated, analysed and presented us-ing appropriate statistical tools like frequency distribution, percentage and weighted mean. It was recommended that similar studies be conducted in order to develop a cul-ture of pedagogical innovations and academic research. The SAI developed in this may further be evaluated based from other perspective like that of ICT experts.
References
Reyes,Y.,&De Guia. (2017). Development of English Worktext in English 101. International Journal of Science and Research, 6(10), 746.
Ozalp. (2006). A Study on Implementing the Technique of Caricature in Science and Environmental Education. Unpublished Master Thesis. Celal Bayar University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Manisa.
Yusuf, M. O. (2005). Information and Communication Education: Analyzing the Nigerian National Policy for Information Technology. In-ternational Education Journal, 6(3), 316-321.
Reigeluth, C.M. (1999). Instructional Design Theories and Models, A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory Volume II. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J., & Smaldino, S. (1999). Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning. (6th ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prince Hall. EDIT 6180 University of Georgia..
MurrayJ.(1997). Hamlet on the Holodeck. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Accessed February 23, 2016 http://www.educause.edu/research-and-publications/books/educating-net-generation/planning-neomillennial-learning-styles-implications-investments-tech.
Gulbahar, Y. (2005).Learning Preferences and Learning Styles of Online Adult Learners. Distance Education Center, Ankara University, Golbaşı, 06830 Ankara, Turkey.
Orlik, P. B. (1994). ElectronicMedia Criticism, Third Edition. Focal Press,Master e-book.
Battalio, J. (2009). Success in Distance Education: Do Learning Styles and Multiple Formats Matter? The American Journal of Distance Education,23:71-87.
Whiteley, T. R. (2007)Integrating the Technological Resources of the Online Learning Environment with the Vak Learning-Styles Model to Foster Student Learning. In AMA Winter Educator’s Conference Proceedings by American Marketing Association,1-9.
How to cite this paper
Acceptability Level of Developed Material (SAI) Using ASSURE Model
How to cite this paper: Reyes,Y., & Oreste, J. (2017). Acceptability Level of Developed Material (SAI) Using ASSURE Model. The Educational Review, USA, 1(3), 61-69.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2017.03.003
More Articles
- Attitude, Referring Alternative Penalties
- The Necessity of Compiling a Learners’ German-English Etymological Dictionary for Chinese Students
- Current Situation of Arabic Language Studies in Jordan Universities
- New Aspects of the Teen Suicide
- Design of Ergonomic Illumination Systems for Cultural, Medical, Educational Facilities
- Existing Problems after Dropout Rehabilitation of Entrepreneurship Suspension of Students and Study on Related Management Mechanism