JSFA

Article http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijfsa.2024.09.006

Comparison of Detection Methods for Lactoferrin Iron Saturation

TOTAL VIEWS: 593

Yanjun Xia*, Wei Tan, Li Lan, Genna Ba

Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Co., Ltd., Hohhot 010080, Inner Mongolia, China.

*Corresponding author: Yanjun Xia

Published: September 13,2024

Abstract

Due to the extensive application of lactoferrin in food, medicine, and other fields, quality control is particularly important. As a key quality indicator of lactoferrin, the accurate detection of iron saturation is crucial for ensuring the quality and efficacy of lactoferrin products. However, there is currently no standardized method for detecting iron saturation in lactoferrin within the industry, leading to variations in test results as different manufacturers may employ different detection techniques. Therefore, selecting more accurate and reliable methods for detecting iron saturation in lactoferrin is essential for quality control and the standardized production of lactoferrin products. This paper aims to provide a scientific reference for researchers in choosing the appropriate detection method for lactoferrin iron saturation. The study examines the current widely used detection methods for lactoferrin iron saturation, including saturation analysis (Method 1) and ultravioletvisible spectrophotometry (Method 2). Through in-depth analysis and comparison of the principles, accuracy, and operational complexity of these methods, the results indicate that Method 1 generally yields higher iron saturation values and demonstrates better stability and consistency in repeated measurements. This comparative study aims to offer valuable references for the precise detection of lactoferrin iron saturation, thereby promoting research and development in related fields.

References

[1] Ran L, Shi J, Lin Y, et al. Evaluation of the Protective Bioactivity and Molecular Mechanism Verification of Lactoferrin in an Alzheimer's Mouse Model with Ulcerative Enteritis [J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 2024.

[2] Wang Caiyun, Luo Shubo, Yan Xudong, et al. Comparison of methods for lactoferrin iron saturation [J]. Dairy Industry of China, 2015, 43(02): 54-56+64.

[3] Qi Yingjie, Zheng Nan, Wang Jiaqi, et al. Structure-activity effects, detection methods and influencing factors of different iron saturation of lactoferrin in milk [J]. Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2024, 36(06): 3482-3490.

[4] Su Xia, Liu Songyan, Zhu Zichen, et al. Study on the detection method of lactoferrin in fresh milk and dairy products [J]. Livestock and Veterinary Today, 2024, 40(02): 11-13.

[5] Bokkhim H, Tran T, Bansal N, et al. Evaluation of different methods for determination of the iron saturation level in bovine lactoferrin [J]. Food Chemistry, 2014, 152, 121-127.

[6] Ni Dan. Evaluation and study of lactoferrin properties [D]. Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2011.

[7] Bengoechea, C., Peinado, I., & McClements, D. J. Formation of protein nanoparticles by controlled heat treatment of lactoferrin: Factors affecting particle characteristics. Food Hydrocolloids, 2011, 25(5), 1354-1360.

[8] Irene F, Matteo D, Benedetta C, et al. Evaluation of hydration with lactoferrin on late-instar; Tenebrio molitor; larvae performance and functional properties of obtained meal [J]. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2023, 22(1): 982-994.

[9] Nika O, Timeja P P, Albin K, et al. Stability-Indicating Analytical Approach for Stability Evaluation of Lactoferrin [J]. Pharmaceutics, 2021, 13(7): 1065-1065.

[10] Lavanya M, Rao A R, Kumar A K, et al. Evaluation of the reproductive toxicity of antiretroviral drug loaded lactoferrin nanoparticles [J]. Systems Biology in Reproductive Medicine, 2019, 65(3): 205-213.

How to cite this paper

Comparison of Detection Methods for Lactoferrin Iron Saturation

How to cite this paper: Yanjun Xia, Wei Tan, Li Lan, Genna Ba. (2024) Comparison of Detection Methods for Lactoferrin Iron SaturationInternational Journal of Food Science and Agriculture8(3), 127-130.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijfsa.2024.09.006