Integrating Literature into Science Education: A Comprehensive Guide
TOTAL VIEWS: 1158
Abstract
This paper guides into the transformative power of literature in science education, underlining its potential to enrich scientific literacy and cultivate critical thinking, creativity, and problem-solving skills. The choice of literature should be in harmony with the Next Generation Science Standards and 21st Century Skills, ensuring it bolsters scientific literacy and decision-making abilities. The integration process involves guided reading and project-based learning, which can deepen students' grasp of scientific concepts through narrative exploration. By merging literature and science, educators can construct a vibrant learning environment that inspires students to delve into scientific topics from diverse angles, thereby acknowledging the interdependence of science and society. This approach also fosters the development of higher-order cognitive skills by promoting inquiry-based learning and cognitive flexibility. The paper underscores the necessity for ongoing research and collaboration among educators, scientists, and literary experts to devise practical tools and methods for literature-driven science education. Digital platforms and professional development programs are recommended to support educators in this pursuit. Finally, the paper champions the transformative influence of literature in science education, accentuating its role in shaping students' minds and perspectives. By embracing narratives and scientific inquiry, educators can foster a stimulating learning environment that empowers students to apply scientific concepts meaningfully in various aspects of their lives.
References
Akerson, V. L., Avsar Erumit, B., & Elcan Kaynak, N. (2019). Teaching Nature of Science through children’s literature: an early childhood preservice teacher study. International Journal of Science Education, 41(18), 2765-2787. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1698785.
Akpur, U. (2020). Critical, Reflective, Creative Thinking and Their Reflections on Academic Achievement. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100683.
Asim, S., & McDonald, J. (2023). Reframing Elementary Science Methods Courses Using Literature to Bring in a Global Perspective. In Internationalizing Rural Science Teacher Preparation: Action Research for Global Competency (pp. 61-78). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46073-9_5.
Atkinson, T. S., Matusevich, M. N., & Huber, L. (2009). Making Science Trade Book Choices for Elementary Classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 62(6), 484-497. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.62.6.3.
Bertram, A., & Tomas, C. (2023). Evaluative judgement–a practitioner's case in chemistry research projects. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 24(1), 312-326. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RP00213B.
Bibby, S. (2014). Criteria and creation: Literary texts and a literature textbook. The Journal of Literature in Language Teaching, 3(1), 20-31.
Blank, J., McGaughey, K., Keeling, E., Thorp, K., Shannon, C., & Scaramozzino, J. (2017). A Novel Assessment Tool for Quantitative Evaluation of Science Literature Search Performance: Application to First-Year and Senior Undergraduate Biology Majors. College & Research Libraries, 77(6), 682. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.6.682.
Bradbury, L. U. (2014). Linking Science and Language Arts: A Review of the Literature Which Compares Integrated Versus Non-integrated Approaches. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(4), 465-488.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-013-9368-6.
Brassell, D. (2006). Inspiring Young Scientists with Great Books. The Reading Teacher, 60(4), 336-342.
https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.60.4.3.
Bulut Ates, C., & Aktamis, H. (2024). Investigating the effects of creative educational modules blended with Cognitive Research Trust (CoRT) techniques and Problem Based Learning (PBL) on students' scientific creativity skills and perceptions in science education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 101471.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101471.
Cartwright, J. (2007). Science and literature: towards a conceptual framework. Science & education, 16, 115-139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-005-4702-9.
Chatzikyriakidou, K., & McCartney, M. (2022). Motivation in Reading Primary Scientific Literature: a questionnaire to assess student purpose and efficacy in reading disciplinary literature. International Journal of Science Education, 44(8), 1230-1250. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2073482.
Clark, S. K., & Lott, K. (2017). Integrating Science Inquiry and Literacy Instruction for Young Children. The Reading Teacher, 70(6), 701-710. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1572.
Contreras, J. G., & Faustino, J. B. (2022). LITERATURE-BASED APPROACH IN DEVELOPING SCIENTIFIC SKILLS AMONG YOUNG CHILDREN. Framework, 5(05). https://doi.org/10.54922/IJEHSS.2022.0448.
Cooper, A. L., Brennan, M. C., Leslie, G. D., & Brown, J. A. (2023). Integrating Literature as a Data Source in Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. https://doi.org/10.1177_15586898231188500.
Corbin, J. (2007). Criteria for evaluation. Journal of Qualitative Research, 117-129.
Davies Lackey, A. J. (2023). Problem-Solving Interdisciplinary Collaboration to Address Complex Behavior Problems. In J. DeSimone & L. Roberts (Eds.), Cases on Leadership Dilemmas in Special Education (pp. 61-72). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8499-9.ch005.
DeHaan, R. L. (2009). Teaching creativity and inventive problem solving in science. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 8(3), 172-181. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.08-12-0081.
Dong, K., Xu, H., Luo, R., Wei, L., & Fang, S. (2018). An integrated method for interdisciplinary topic identification and prediction: a case study on information science and library science. Scientometrics, 115, 849-868.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2694-x.
DongJin, S., & Ashari, Z. B. M. (2024). Project-based Learning in Early Science Education a Systematic Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(2), 627-642.
http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i2/21365.
Du Toit, E., Marx, B., & Smith, R. (2024). Delineating the parameters of integrated thinking: A synthetic literature review. Journal of Economic and Financial Sciences, 17(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.4102/jef.v17i1.891.
Ediger, M. (2010). Children's literature and the science curriculum. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(2), 117-120. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A231807631/HRCA?
Febriya, D., Festiyed, Hikmah, N., & Mufit, F. (2023). Literature Study: Application of Self Assessment in Improving Character Quality, 21st Century Abilities, and Physics Learning Results. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(12), 1370-1376. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.5219.
Fischer, P., & Thies, B. (2023). Stories as a tool in science communication: an experimental analysis. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 14(3), 418-432. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2023.2285743.
Gu, N., & Hahnloser, R. H. (2023). SciLit: A Platform for Joint Scientific Literature Discovery, Summarization and Citation Generation. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.acl-demo.22.
Hartmeyer, R., Stevenson, M. P., & Bentsen, P. (2016). Evaluating design-based formative assessment practices in outdoor science teaching. Educational Research, 58(4), 420-441. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2016.1237857.
Hodder, J., Middendorf, G., & Ebert-May, D. (2005). Problem solving: A foundation for modeling. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3(9), 501-502. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0501:PSAFFM]2.0.CO;2.
Hudha, M. N., Fajriyah, M. I., Rosyidah, F. U. N., & Ayu, H. D. (2023). Project-based learning in improving scientific literacy: Systematic literature review. Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research, 5(2), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.33292/petier.v5i2.157.
Hug, J. W. (2010). Exploring instructional strategies to develop prospective elementary teachers’ children’s literature book evaluation skills for science, ecology and environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 16(3-4), 367-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620903549748.
Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2016). Learning to Feel Like a Scientist. Science Education, 100(2), 189-220.
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21202.
Jakubowski, H., Procko, K., Sikora, A., Lavin, E. S., & Chatterjee, S. (2024). Abstract 1599 Development and Use of Literature Guided Assessments (LGAs) in an OER to Teach Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 300(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2024.105923.
Jurecki, K., & Wander, M. C. F. (2012). Science Literacy, Critical Thinking, and Scientific Literature: Guidelines for Evaluating Scientific Literature in the Classroom. Journal of Geoscience Education, 60(2), 100-105.
https://doi.org/10.5408/11-221.1.
Kadirhanogullari, K. M. & Kose, O. E. (2024). Project-based learning in science education: A bibliometric network analysis. International Journal on Studies in Education (IJonSE), 6(1), 85-108. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.200.
Kareem, M. N. A. (2022). Importance of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS in Academic Research Writing): A Structured Literature Survey. South Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(3), 94-102.
https://doi.org/10.48165/sajssh.2022.3305.
Knight, S., & Thompson, K. (2022). Developing a text-integration task for investigating and teaching interdisciplinarity in science teams. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09937-7.
Koomen, M. H., Weaver, S., Blair, R. B., & Oberhauser, K. S. (2016). Disciplinary literacy in the science classroom: Using adaptive primary literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6), 847-894.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21317.
Krauss, J., Mani, S., Cromwell, J., San Roman Pineda, I. & Cleaver, F. (2022). Bringing research alive through stories: reflecting on research storytelling as a public engagement method. Research for All, 6(1).
https://doi.org/10.14324/RFA.06.1.20.
Kurt, G., & Akoglu, K. (2023). Project-based learning in science education: A comprehensive literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 19(3), e2311. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/13677.
Lambré, C., Barat Baviera, J. M., Bolognesi, C., Chesson, A., Cocconcelli, P. S., Crebelli, R., Gott, D. M., Grob, K., Mengelers, M., Mortensen, A., Rivière, G., Steffensen, L., Tlustos, C., Loveren, H. V., Vernis, L., Zorn, H., Dudler, V., Milana, M. R., Papaspyrides, C., . . . Lampi, E. (2024). Scientific Guidance on the criteria for the evaluation and on the preparation of applications for the safety assessment of post-consumer mechanical PET recycling processes intended to be used for manufacture of materials and articles in contact with food. EFSA Journal, 22(7), e8879. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8879.
Lee S., Zhong M., Foster C., Segura-Totten M., McCartney M. (2022). From Novice to Expert: An Assessment to Measure Strategies Students Implement While Learning to Read Primary Scientific Literature. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 23, e00126-22. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00126-22.
León, B. (2024). Introduction: Storytelling. Science through stories. Metode Science Studies Journal, (14), 132-135.
https://doi.org/10.7203/metode.14.28045.
Lima, L. G. de, & Ricardo, E. C. (2015). Física e Literatura: uma revisão bibliográfica. Caderno Brasileiro De Ensino De Física, 32(3), 577-617. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-7941.2015v32n3p577.
Liston, M., & Hennessy, N. (2018). An integrated approach in promoting the development of literacy and scientific skills in the primary science classroom. Teaching Science, 64(4), 22-31.
https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.153522755012896.
Littmann, M. (2005). Courses in science writing as literature. Public Understanding of Science.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662505048198.
Lynd-Balta, E. (2006). Using literature and innovative assessments to ignite interest and cultivate critical thinking skills in an undergraduate neuroscience course. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 5(2), 167-174. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.05-08-0108.
MacLeod, M., & Nersessian, N. J. (2016). Interdisciplinary problem-solving: emerging modes in integrative systems biology. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6, 401-418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-016-0157-x.
Mat Daud, N., Mohamad Ali, A., Mat Daud, N., Juhary, J. & Raihanah M. M. (2018). A MOOC for Literature Integrated Language Classroom: Pedagogical Suggestions for the Development of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, 4, 13-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call4.2.
Miller, K. R. (2018). Making Connections: Impact of primary literature assignments on lecture and laboratory learning. The FASEB Journal, 31(S1), 751.7. https://doi.org/10.1096/fasebj.31.1_supplement.751.7.
Nada, N., Mansour, Y., & Sabry, H. (2024). Vital Cognitive Skills for Undergraduates Based on Academic Discipline: A Literature Review. Buhūth, 4(4), 44-64. https://doi.org/10.21608/buhuth.2024.262142.1629.
Nahon-Crystal, E., Russo-Netzer, P., Segev Y., et al. (2024). What is the Story of Science Teaching? Integrative Teaching of Literature and Science. IJPINT, 11(1), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.7070.
Nijhof, A. R. (2023). Narrative transportation, identification, and storytelling in environmental (science) communication. ScienceOpen Preprints. https://doi.org/10.14293/PR2199.000068.v1.
Perdana, D., Saptasari, M., & Susanto, H. (2023, January). The effects of inquiry project-based learning on the increasing student's science literacy skills and creative thinking skills. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2569, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0131311.
Rios, J., Xana, S. P., & Lopes, J. B. (2022, August). From Stories to Science: An Exploration Guide to Promote Epistemic Practices in Primary School. In International Conference on Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education (pp. 157-170). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22918-3_12.
Setya, D. S., Maslia, N., Sasmitha, H. M., Rusda, R., & Erika, F. (2024). LITERATURE REVIEW: GROWING STUDENT CHARACTER EDUCATION BASED ON LOCAL WISDOM IN SCIENCE LEARNING. PROGRES PENDIDIKAN, 5(1), 26-31. https://doi.org/10.29303/prospek.v5i1.401.
Smith, K. G., & Paradise, C. J. (2022). Teaching the process of science with primary literature: Using the CREATE pedagogy in ecological courses. Ecology and Evolution, 12(12), e9644. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9644.
Spagnolo, C., Bolondi, G., Corni, F., & Drius, M. (2024). Storytelling in STEM Disciplines: At the Crossroads of Science and Humanities. Education Sciences, 14(7), 747. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070747.
Sporea, A., Sporea, D., Paiş, V. (2015). A Collaborative Platform for Science Teaching at Elementary and Middle School Level. International Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20150401.11.
Stengel, A., Stanke, K. M., McPherson, M. R., & Drijber, R. A. (2020). Virtually engaging students through collaborative investigation of scientific literature, a case study. Natural Sciences Education, 50(1), e20051.
https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.20051.
Teasdale, R. M., Pitts, R. T., Gates, E. F., & Shim, C. (2023). Teaching specification of evaluative criteria: A guide for evaluation education. New Directions for Evaluation, 2023(177), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20546.
Tomovic, C. (2017). Scientific Literacy Matters: Using Literature to Meet Next Generation Science Standards and 21st Century Skills. K-12 STEM Education, 3(2), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.14456/k12stemed.2017.4.
Trofholz, A., Shanafelt, A., Adamek, M., Grannon, K., Loth, K., Caspi, C., & Berge, J. M. (2020). Integration as a tool for interprofessional work: A synthesis of the literature regarding how to use integrative strategies to address complex public health problems. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 21, 100383.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2020.100383.
Ulia, N., Waluya, S. B., Hidayah, I., & Pujiastuti, E. (2021). The relation of complex problem solving with reflective abstraction: a systematic literature review. Int J Eval & Res Educ ISSN, 2252, 8822.
http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26358.
Vieira, R. A. da C., Bonetti, T. C. de S., Marques, M. M. C., & Facina, G. (2020). Criteria for evaluating studies at scientific medical events. Mastology, 30, 1-7.
Retrieved from https://revistamastology.emnuvens.com.br/revista/article/view/947.
Vlahakis, G. N., Skordoulis, K., & Tampakis, K. (2014). Introduction: Science and literature special isssue. Science & Education, 23, 521-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9601-x.
Vlahakis, G. N., Skordoulis, K., & Tampakis, K. (2014). Introduction: Science and literature special issue. Science & Education, 23, 521-526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9601-x.
Wakid, M., Sofyan, H., Widowati, A., & Zaida Ilma, A. (2024). Learning-oriented assessment: a systematic literature network analysis. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2366075.
Watson, T., Maxwell, N., Barnes, M. A., & Berry, B. (2024). Integrating Quality Literature with Instruction Based in the Science of Reading. In Supporting Students’ Intellectual Freedom in Schools: The Right to Read (pp. 84-106). IGI Global. https://www.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9655-8.ch005.
Webb, P. (2010). Science Education and Literacy: Imperatives for the Developed and Developing World. Science. https://doi.org/1182596.
Welch IV, J. (2017). All Too Human: Conflict and Common Ground in Interdisciplinary Research and Complex Problem Solving. Issues in Interdisciplinary Studies, 35, 88-112. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1193608.
Wheatley, B. C., Gerde, H. K., & Cabell, S. Q. (2016). Integrating Early Writing into Science Instruction in Preschool. The Reading Teacher, 70(1), 83-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1470.
Wise, M. J. (2021). Traumatic exposure of college freshmen to primary scientific literature: How to avoid turning students off from reading journal articles. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103422.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103422.
Yanti, F. A., & Thohir M. A. (2024). Higher order thinking skills in science learning: a systematic review from 2014-2023. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(4), 2419-2419.
https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i4.28082.
How to cite this paper
Integrating Literature into Science Education: A Comprehensive Guide
How to cite this paper: Eleftheria Tsiouri, Konstantinos T. Kotsis. (2024). Integrating Literature into Science Education: A Comprehensive Guide. Journal of Literature Advances, 1(1), 36-47.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jla.2024.12.004
More Articles
- Half of the Fun Had Gone: Revisiting ‘Fun’ in Early Children Education Through the Re-reading of Asimov’s “The Fun They Had” in COVID Situation
- Practical Paths of Foreign Literature History Courses in Teaching
- Study of the Metaphor of Blindness in Sartre's Existentialist View of Blindness
- Integrating Literature into Science Education: A Comprehensive Guide
- Philosophical Education During the Almohad Rule/Ibn Rushd
- The Literature of Fairy Tales and Misconceptions About Concepts of Physics