TOTAL VIEWS: 472
Objective: To observe the clinical analysis of 28 cases of HELLP syndrome. Methods: A retrospective analysis was carried out on 28 patients with HELLP syndrome admitted to our hospital from January 2015 to January 2025. Based on the classification, they were divided into a complete HELLP group and a partial HELLP group; based on the patients’ prognosis, they were divided into a good prognosis group and a poor prognosis group. The general and laboratory indicators were clarified for different classifications, and the factors affecting neonatal prognosis in the good prognosis group and poor prognosis group were analyzed. Results: Regarding the general and laboratory indicators in different classifications, there was no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) between the complete HELLP group and the partial HELLP group in terms of age, gestational weeks, platelet (PLT) count, and total bilirubin (TBIL) levels. The ALT count in the complete group and the negative rate of peripheral smear were lower than those in the partial group, whereas the LDH count was higher than that in the partial group; the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). In the comparison of factors affecting neonatal prognosis between the good prognosis group and the poor prognosis group, the age of the good prognosis group was younger than that of the poor prognosis group, while gestational weeks and neonatal birth weight were higher, and the neonatal asphyxia rate was lower; these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in classification between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: HELLP syndrome is characterized by severe disease progression and rapid deterioration. For such patients, timely and accurate diagnosis, rapid implementation of effective treatment, and timely termination of pregnancy when necessary are key measures to significantly reduce maternal and neona-tal mortality and improve prognosis.
[1] Wang X, Hao J, Qu F, et al. A case of HELLP syndrome complicated by acute hepatic and renal failure. Precis Med J. 2024;39(6):563-4.
[2] Li W, Zhou L, Kang S. Clinical features and pregnancy outcomes of antenatal and postpartum HELLP syndrome. J Pract Obstet Gynecol. 2024;40(11):905-11.
[3] Wang J. Discussion on pregnancy outcomes of expectant treatment for early-onset severe preeclampsia complicated by fetal growth restriction. China Pract Med. 2024;19(18):67-70.
[4] Li Z, Chen Q. Avoid a tragic outcome by preventing the onset of HELLP syndrome in time. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet. 2024;40(8):779-84.
[5] Wang L, Xu A. A case of HELLP syndrome with literature review. China Med Sci. 2024;14(14):187-90.
[6] Hu X. Changes in coagulation function indicators in patients with severe preeclampsia complicated by HELLP syndrome and their clinical significance. Med Clin Res. 2024;41(7):1038-40.
[7] Ling J, Wang Y. Research progress on the role of chemerin in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. China Fam Plan Gynecol Obstet. 2024;16(7):7-9,22.
[8] Wang R, Chang R. A case of postpartum HELLP syndrome leading to acute kidney injury and reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome. J Changzhi Med Coll. 2024;38(3):233-5.
[9] Lu W, Liu Y, Chen S, et al. Nursing care for a case of eclampsia complicated by HELLP syndrome. Contemp Nurse. 2024;31(18):94-7.
[10] Zhou J, Lin C, He J, et al. A case of HELLP syndrome complicated by reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome and fetal death. Chongqing Med. 2024;53(10):1594-7.
[11] Tian S, Wang L, Hao Z, et al. Clinical analysis of 76 cases of HELLP syndrome. Prog Mod Obstet Gynecol. 2024;33(5):376-80.
[12] Zhong R, Han Y. Application effect of the modified early warning score combined with a rapid response system in patients with severe preeclampsia. China Med Herald. 2024;21(14):172-5.
Clinical Analysis of 28 Cases of HELLP Syndrome
How to cite this paper: Xiaohong Li, Fan Qin, Lili Lin, Zhangye Xu. (2025) Clinical Analysis of 28 Cases of HELLP Syndrome. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine Research, 9(2), 226-229.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijcemr.2025.03.011