
TOTAL VIEWS: 1607
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has brought new possibilities for poetry creation, but it has also triggered ethical controversies over the dissolution of literary subjectivity and the survival of humanistic values. Based on the theory of techno-social construction, this study adopts a qualitative research method to systematically explore the technological acceptance and ethical anxiety of AI poetry creation among students of literature departments in Chinese colleges and universities through questionnaire surveys (with 212 valid samples) and in-depth interviews (with two interviewees). The study finds that the student body generally recognizes the instrumental value of AI in terms of formal standardization and creative efficiency, but senior students, due to the deepening of their academic training, emphasize the irreplaceability of humanistic kernels such as literary "mood" and "flavor", and criticize the homogenization and affective mechanization of AI creation. The study further reveals that students' resistance to technological alienation through strategies such as "embedding private memories" and "artificial coloring" reflects the "author-centrism" and "poetic expression" in literary education. In addition, the fragmentation of social media communication has intensified the anxiety about the loss of literary depth, while the limitations of AI in decoding cultural metaphors highlight the rupture between technological logic and humanistic experience. This study provides implications for the dilemma of the survival of humanistic values in the technological era, calling on literary education to critically embrace technological tools while strengthening the centrality of individual life experience in creation, in order to guard the kernel of literature's humanistic spirit.
Artificial Intelligence Poetry Writing; Ethical Anxiety; Techno-Social Construction Theory; Literary Subjectivity; College Literature Students
Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., et al. (2020). Generative adversarial networks. Communications of the ACM, 63(11), 139-144.
Jasanoff, S., Markle, G. E., Peterson, J. C., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of science and technology studies. Sage Publications.
Li, G. (2025). Moving beyond humanistic concepts of modern literature: Reflections on the issue of artificial intelligence literary authors. Jianghai Academic Journal, (2), 232-242.
Luo, Y. (2025). The 1990s context and the third generation of "Contemporary Literature"—A re-reading centered on Hong Zicheng's History of Contemporary Chinese Literature. Masterpiece Appreciation, (7), 72-79.
https://doi.org/10.20273/j.cnki.mzxs.2025.07.006
Nie, C. (2025). Combination and generation: The genealogy of literary machines and its poetic significance. Literary Review, (1), 171-181.
https://doi.org/CNKI:SUN:WXPL.0.2025-01-017
Peng, M. (2025). Online literature in the era of generative artificial intelligence: New changes and future. Contemporary Literature Forum, (2), 138-145.
https://doi.org/10.19290/j.cnki.51-1076/i.2025.02.007
Russell, S. (2019). Human compatible: AI and the problem of control. Penguin UK.
Wang, Y., Huang, J., & Li, J. (2024). Mechanisms, changes and trends: Online literary publishing in the context of generative artificial intelligence. Publishing Science, (6), 101-110.
https://doi.org/10.13363/j.publishingjournal.2024.06.008
Zhao, Y. (2025). "Human-machine mutualization": The philosophical dimension of AI risk research and response strategy. Journal of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Science Edition).
https://doi.org/10.14132/j.cnki.nysk.20250313.001
Ethical Anxiety of Chinese College Literature Students Toward Artificial Intelligence Poetry Writing: A Qualitative Study Based on Questionnaires and In-depth Interviews
How to cite this paper: Jiajun Tang, Ziyu Zhao. (2025) Ethical Anxiety of Chinese College Literature Students Toward Artificial Intelligence Poetry Writing: A Qualitative Study Based on Questionnaires and In-depth Interviews. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science, 9(6), 1185-1190.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2025.06.023