
TOTAL VIEWS: 1330
Metadiscourse is a core linguistic resource for textbooks to be user-friendly. The use of metadiscourse in the textbook accordingly draws the researchers’ attention. This paper, thus, focuses on a set of newly published Chinese EFL textbooks of Junior High School, and analyses the metadiscourse use with an aim to perceive the interaction between the textbook and the user. The metadiscourse use was first analyzed in terms of the frequency and distribution of the metadiscourse markers. The pragmatic functions of each marker were also explored based on Hyland’s model of metadiscourse. The research revealed that transitions, frame markers, and endophoric markers were frequently employed to guide students through the textbook and comprehend the learning materials. Results also showed that reader mentions, directives, and questions were highly evident in the data investigated due to genre convention. They played a critical role in facilitating the engagement of students in the textbook context. The findings of this study may have significant implications for Chinese EFL teachers about how to use metadiscourse to improve classroom teaching efficiency.
Metadiscourse; Chinese EFL Textbook; Interaction
Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ädel, A. (2010). Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: A taxonomy of metadiscourse in spoken and written academic English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 69-97.
Crismore, A., & Avon. (1984). The rhetoric of textbooks: Metadiscourse. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(3), 279-296.
Fu, X., & Xu, J. (2012). Recent developments in metadiscourse research abroad. Contemporary Linguistics, 14(3), 260-271.
Guo, B. (2022). Learner-centered English textbooks: Characteristics, representations, and implications. Curriculum, Teaching Material and Method, 42(9), 136-144.
Hyland, K. (2005a). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2005b). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192.
Hyland, K. (2013). Discourse studies reader: Essential excerpts. Bloomsbury Academic.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177.
Mauranen, A. (2010). Discourse reflexivity—A discourse universal? The case of ELF. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 13-40.
Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2022). English curriculum standards for compulsory education (2022 version). Beijing Normal University Press.
Walková, M. (2020). Transition markers in EAP textbooks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 46, 100874.
Williams, J. M. (1981). Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace. Boston: Scott Foresman.
Yu, S. (2019). A study on metadiscourse in foreign language textbooks (1912-1949): From the perspective of text linguistics [Doctoral dissertation]. Shanghai: East China Normal University.
Zhang, D., Guo, C., & Yu, L. (2015). Educational psychology. Beijing: People’s Education Press.
Guiding and Engaging the Students: Metadiscourse in Chinese EFL Textbook of Junior High School
How to cite this paper: Changjuan Zhang, Siqing Li. (2025). Guiding and Engaging the Students: Metadiscourse in Chinese EFL Textbook of Junior High School. The Educational Review, USA, 9(6), 610-616.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/er.2025.06.009