Keywords

Digital technology acceptance scale (DTAS); Cognitive TAM2; Employees; Age-diverse workgroups; Human resource development

References

Abri, D., & Boll, T. (2020). Aging, technology, and psychology: Models of assistive device use viewed from an action-theoretical perspective on lifespan development. European Psychologist, 25(3), 211-228.

https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000407

Ackerman, P. L., & Kanfer, R. (2020). Work in the 21st century: New directions for aging and adult development. American Psychologist, 75(4), 486-498.
https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000615

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting behavior. Prentice-Hall.

Ajzen, I. (2005). Attitudes, personality and behaviour. McGraw-Hill education (UK).

Ajzen, I. (2014). Attitude structure and behavior. In Attitude structure and function (pp. 241-274). Psychology Press.

Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., Lohmann, S., & Albarracín, D. (2018). The influence of attitudes on behavior. The handbook of attitudes, Volume 1: Basic principles, pp. 197-255.

Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314-324.
https://publons.com/publon/10.1002/hbe2.195

Al-Alaumie, A. (2013). Enhanced technology acceptance model to explain and predict learners’ behavioral intentions in learning management. PhD Thesis, University of Bedfordshire.

Alcover, C. M., Guglielmi, D., Depolo, M., & Mazzetti, G. (2021). “Aging-and-Tech Job Vulnerability”: A proposed framework on the dual impact of aging and AI, robotics, and automation among older workers. Organizational Psychology Review, 11(2), 175-201.
https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386621992105

Ammenwerth, E. (2019). Technology acceptance models in health informatics: TAM and UTAUT. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 263, 64-71.
https://doi.org/10.3233/shti190111

Bakker, A. B., Petrou, P., Op den Kamp, E. M., & Tims, M. (2020). Proactive vitality management, work engagement, and creativity: The role of goal orientation. Applied Psychology, 69(2), 351-378.
https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12173

Baltes, P. B., Reese, H. W., & Lipsitt, L. P. (1980). Life-span developmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 65-110.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.000433

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. In S. T. Fiske (Ed.), Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26. Annual Reviews, Inc.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Bandura, A. (2013). The role of self-efficacy in goal-based motivation. In E. A. Locke & G. P. Latham (Eds.). New developments in goal setting and task performance, pp. 147-157. Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203082744

Bashir, M., Hameed, A., Bari, M. W., & Ullah, R. (2021). The impact of age-diverse workforce on organization performance: Mediating role of job crafting. SAGE Open, 11(1).
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244021999058

Bencsik, A., & Juhasz, T. (2023). Impact of technostress on work-life balance. Human Technology, 19(1), 41-61.
https://doi.org/10.1425/1795-6889.2023.19-1.4

Bosnjak, M., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Selected recent advances and applications. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 352.
https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i3.3107

Brand, R., & Ekkekakis, P. (2021). Exercise behavior change revisited: Affective-reflective theory. Essentials of exercise and sport psychology: An open access textbook (pp. 62-92).
https://doi.org/10.51224/B1004

Brien, M., Forest, J., Mageau, G. A., Boudrias, J.-S., Desrumaux, P., Brunet, L. & Morin, E. M. (2012). The basic psychological needs at work scale. Measurement invariance between Canada and France. Applied Psychology: Health and Wellbeing, 4(2), 167-187.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2012.01067.x

Burghart, M., Sahm, A. H., & Mier, D. (2023). Investigating measurement invariance of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-8 (ERQ-8) across 29 countries. Current Psychology, 42(36), 32054-32060. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04220-6

Burmeister, A., Alterman, V., Fasbender, U., & Wang, M. (2022). Too much to know? The cognitive demands of daily knowledge seeking and the buffering role of coworker contact quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(8), 1303.
https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waab002

Button, S. B., Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1996). Goal orientation in organizational research: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(1), 26-48.

https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0063

Chen, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Beyers, W., Boone, L., Deci, E. L., der Kaap-Deeder, J., Duriez, B., Lens, W., Matos, L., Mouratidis, A., Ryan, R. M., Sheldon, K. M., Soenens, B., Van Petegem, S., & Verstuyf, J. (2015). Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures. Motivation and Emotion, 39(2), 216-236.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-014-9450-1

Chen, X., & Hu, J. (2020). Antecedents of adolescent students’ ICT self-efficacy: The ICT dataset. Data in Brief, 33, 106437.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104004

Chau, V. S., & Quire, C. (2020). Back to the future of women in technology: insights from understanding the shortage of women in innovation sectors for managing corporate foresight. In Sarpong, D. & Meissner, D. (Eds.), Corporate foresight and innovation management (pp. 123-140). Routledge.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429318559-10

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed). L. Erlbaum Associates.

Cunha, M. P. E., Neves, P., Clegg, S. R., & Rego, A. (2015). Tales of the unexpected: Discussing improvisational learning. Management Learning, 46(5), 511-529.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507614549121

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Davis, F. D. (2015). On the relationship between HCI and technology acceptance research. In Human-computer interaction and management information systems: Foundations (pp. 409-415). Routledge.

Davis, F. D. (2024). Evolution of TAM. In Davis, F. D. & Granić, A. (2014) The technology acceptance model: 30 years of TAM, Chapter 1, pp. 19-57.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45274-2_2

Davis, F. D., & Granić, A. (2024). The technology acceptance model: 30 years of TAM. SpringerBriefs in Human-Computer Interaction (eBook). Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45274-2

Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (1996). A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology ac-ceptance model: three experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45(1), 19-45.

https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1996.0040

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2011). Levels of analysis, regnant causes of behavior and well-being: The role of psychological needs. Psychological Inquiry, 22(1), 17-22.
https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2011.545978

Destatis. (2023). Erwerbstätigkeit älterer Menschen [Employment of older persons]. Statistical data retrieved from:

https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Querschnitt/Demografischer-Wandel/Aeltere-Menschen/erwerbstaetigkeit.html

Dietz, L., & Fasbender, U. (2022). Age-diverse workplace friendship: A systematic literature review and recommendations for future research. Work, Aging and Retirement, 8(2), 163-197.
https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waab028

Downey, J. P., & Zeltmann, S. (2009). The role of competence level in the self‐efficacy–skills relationship: an empirical examination of the skill acquisition process and its implications for information technology training. International Journal of Training and Development, 13(2), 96-110.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2419.2009.00320.x

Drazic, I., & Schermuly, C. C. (2024). Too old for modern work? An explicit and implicit measure of the modern-work-is-young stereotype. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 38(1), 59-89.

https://doi.org/10.1177/23970022231195061

Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040

Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256

Dwivedi, Y. K., Wade, M. Dr., & Schneberger, S. L. (2015). Information Systems Theory. Explaining and Predicting our Digital Society, Vol. 1. Springer

Eisinga, R., Grotenhuis, M. T., & Pelzer, B. (2013).The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637-642.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3

Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5-12.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5

Erber, J. T., & Szuchman, L. T. (2014). Great myths of aging. John Wiley & Sons.

Fasbender, U., Gerpott, F. H., & Unger, D. (2021). Give and take? Knowledge exchange between older and younger employees as a function of generativity and development striving. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(10), 2420-2443.
https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waac035

Fasbender, U., & Gerpott, F. H. (2022). Knowledge transfer between younger and older employees: A temporal social comparison model. Work, Aging and Retirement, 8(2), 146-162.
https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waab017

Feng, G. C., Su, X., Lin, Z., He, Y., Luo, N., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Determinants of technology acceptance: Two model-based meta-analytic reviews. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(1), 83-104.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020952400

Fenwick, T., & Tennant, M. (2020). Understanding adult learners. In Foley, G. (Ed.), Dimensions of adult learning (pp. 55-73). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003115366-6

Förtsch, S. M., & Gärig-Daugs, A. (2020). Trust yourself: You have the IT-Factor! Career coaching for female computer scientists. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 11(3), 490-527. Retrieved from 

https://genderandset.open.ac.uk/index.php/genderandset/article/view/660.

Garcia, P. R. J. M., Bordia, P., Restubog, S. L. D., & Caines, V. (2018). Sleeping with a broken promise: The moderating role of generativity concerns in the relationship between psychological contract breach and insomnia among older workers. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 326-338.
https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2222

Geitz, G., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., & Kirschner, P. A. (2016). Changing learning behavior: Self-efficacy and goal orientation in PBL groups in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 75, 146-158.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jier.2015.11.001

Geitz, S., & Schnabel, C. (2023). Digitalization is not gender-neutral. Economics Letters, 230, 111256. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111256

Gorovoj, A., & Schorr, A. (2020). Zur wahren Bedeutung von Einstellungs- und Persönlichkeitsfaktoren für die Akzeptanz Digitaler Medien. Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft (Ed.). Digitaler Wandel, Digitale Arbeit, Digitaler Mensch? Dokumentation des 66. Arbeitswissenschaftlichen Kongresses, No.35, B.20.3, pp. 1-6.

Greve, W., & Staudinger, U. M. (2015). Resilience in later adulthood and old age: Resources and potentials for successful aging. Developmental psychopathology: Volume III: Risk, disorder, and adaptation, pp. 796-840.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939406.ch21

Guner, H. & Acaturk, C., (2020). The use and acceptance of ICT by senior citizens: a comparison of technology acceptancemodel (TAM) for elderly and young adults. Universal Access to the Information Society, 19, 311-330.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0642-4

Hagger, M. S., & Hardcastle, S. J. (2014). Interpersonal style should be included in taxonomies of behavior change techniques. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 254.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00254

Hanrahan, E. A., Huntoon Lindeman, M. I., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2017). Discounting seniors: Implications of age stereotypes at work. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(4), 370-377.
https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000132

Hartman, R. L., & Barber, E. G. (2020). Women in the workforce: The effect of gender on occupational self-efficacy, work engagement and career aspirations. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 35(1), 92-118.

https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-04-2019-0062

Hauk, N., Hüffmeier, J., & Krumm, S. (2018). Ready to be a silver surfer? A meta-analysis on the relationship between chronological age and technology acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 304-319.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.020

Herbert, J. D., & Brandsma, L. L. (2015). Understanding and enhancing psychological acceptance. Health, happiness, and well-being: Better living through psychological science, pp. 62-88.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483385822.n5

Hubschmid-Vierheilig, E., Rohrer, M., & Mitsakis, F. (2020). Digital competence revolution and human resource development in the United Kingdom and Switzerland. In Loon, M., Stewart, J., Nachmias, S. (Eds.), The Future of HRD, Volume I: Innovation and Technology, 53-91.

 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52410-4_3

Hülür, G., & Macdonald, B. (2020). Rethinking social relationships in old age: Digitalization and the social lives of older adults. American Psychologist, 75(4), 554-566.
https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000604

Huijts, N. M., Molin, E. J., & Steg, L. (2012). Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 16(1), 525-531.

 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.018

v. Humboldt, S. & Leal, I. (2014). Adjustment to aging in late adulthood: A systematic review. International Journal of Gerontology, 8, 108-113.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijge.2014.03.003

Infurna, F. J., Gerstorf, D., & Lachman, M. E. (2020). Midlife in the 2020s: Opportunities and challenges. American Psychologist, 75(4), 470-485.
https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000591

Johnson, V. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2014). Making use of professional development: Employee interests and motivational goal orientations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 84, 99-108.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2013.12.003

Kelly, S., Kaye, S. A., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2023). What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telematics and informatics, 77, 101925.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101925

Kemp, A., Palmer, E., & Strelan, P. (2019). A taxonomy of factors affecting attitudes towards educational technologies for use with technology acceptance models. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2394-2413.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12833

Khoza, T. K., Mabitsela, T., & Nel, P. (2024). Technology readiness, technology acceptance, and work engagement: A mediational analysis. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 50, 2131.
https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v50i0.2131

Kleinbeck, U. (2010). Handlungsziele. In Heckhausen, H. (Ed.). Motivation und Handeln(pp. 285-307). Springer Verlag.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12693-2_11

Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (1998). Ein deutsches Instrument zur Erfassung von Zielorientierungen bei Schülerinnen und Schülern. Diagnostica, 44(4), 173-181.

König, R., Seifert, A., & Doh, M. (2018). Internet use among older Europeans: An analysis based on SHARE data. Universal Access in the Information Society, 17, 621-633.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-018-0609-5

La Barbera, F., & Ajzen, I. (2020). Control interactions in the theory of planned behavior: Rethinking the role of subjective norm. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 401.
https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v16i3.2056

Lai, P. C. (2017). The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. JISTEM-Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14, 21-38. 

https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752017000100002

Legault, L. (2020). The need for competence. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T.K. Shakelford (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1123

Leipold, B. (2012). Lebenslanges Lernen und Bildung im Alter. Kohlhammer Verlag. 

https://doi.org/10.17433/978-3-17-023547-2

Leipold, B. (2015). Resilienz im Erwachsenenalter (Vol. 4451). UTB.
https://doi.org/10.36198/9783838544519

Livingston, G. (2019). Americans 60 and older are spending more time in front of their screens than a decade ago. Retrieved from:
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/18/americans-60-and-older-are-spending-more-time-in-front-of-their-screens-than-a-decade-ago/

Manuti, A., Pastore, S., Scardigno, A. F., Giancaspro, M. L., & Morciano, D. (2015). Formal and informal learning in the workplace: A research review. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(1), 1-17.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12044

Mannucci, P. V., Orazi, D. C., & de Valck, K. (2021). Developing improvisation skills: The influence of individual orientations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(3), 612-658. 

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0001839220975697

Marangunić, N., & Granić, A. (2015). Technology acceptance model: A literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 81-95.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1

Martín-García, A. V., Redolat, R., & Pinazo-Hernandis, S. (2022). Factors influencing intention to technological use in older adults. The TAM Model Application. Research on Aging, 44(7-8), 573-588.

https://doi.org/10.1177/01640275211063797

Mehta, C. M., Arnett, J. J., Palmer, C. G., & Nelson, L. J. (2020). Established adulthood: A new conception of ages 30 to 45. American Psychologist, 75(4), 431-444.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/amp0000600

Miller, C. H., Massey, Z. B., & Ma, H. (2020). Psychological reactance and persuasive message design. The handbook of applied communication research, pp. 457-483.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119399926.ch27

Mlekus, L., Kato-Beiderwieden, A.-L., Schlicher, K. D., & Maier, G. W. (2021). With a little help from change management. Effects of a short-term change intervention on employee attitudes and behavior. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 66(1), 40-51.
https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000372

Moersdorf, L., Freund, A. M., & Daum, M. M. (2022). Spelling out some unaddressed and methodological challenges in empirical lifespan research. Acta Psychologica, 226.
https://doi.org/1016/j.actpsy.2022.103585

Molino, M., Cortese, C. G., & Ghislieri, C. (2020). The promotion of technology acceptance and work engagement in industry 4.0: From personal resources to information and training. International Journal of Environmental Re-search & Public Health, 17(7), 2438.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072438

Molla, A., Gekara, V., Karanasios, S., & Snell, D. (2024). Modeling digital skills beyond the IT workforce: construct definition, measurement and impact on digitalization value. Information Technology & People.

https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-04-2023-0385

Mühlig-Versen, A., Bowen, C. E., & Staudinger, U. M. (2012). Personality plasticity in later adulthood: Contextual and personal resources are needed to increase openness to new experiences. Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 855-866.

https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029357

Mun, Y. Y., & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 431-449.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00114-9

Nagarajan, N. R., Wada, M., Fang, M. L., & Sixsmith, A. (2019). Defining organizational contributions to sustaining an ageing workforce: a bibliometric review. European Journal of Ageing, 16, 337-361. 

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-019-00499-w

Nagdev, K., & Rajesh, A. (2024). Extending Intention to Use Toward Postadoption Behavior—Conceptualizing Actual Usage for Information Technology-Enabled Banking Services. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 5(2).

https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000132

Nastjuk, I., Trang, S., Grummeck-Braamt, J. V., Adam, M. T., & Tarafdar, M. (2024). Integrating and synthesising technostress research: a meta-analysis on technostress creators, outcomes, and IS usage contexts. European Journal of Information Systems, 33(3), 361-382.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2022.2154712

Neeley, T., & Leonardi, P. (2022). Developing a digital mindset. Harvard Business Review, 100(5-6), 50-55.

Odell, B., Gierl, M., & Cutumisu, M. (2021). Testing measurement invariance of PISA 2015 mathematics, science, and ICT scales using the alignment method. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100965.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100965

OECD. (2015). ICT Familiarity Questionnaire for PISA 2015 (Main Survey Version, available at:

http://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/CY6_QST_MS_ICQ_Final.pdf).

Olbrecht, T. (2010). Akzeptanz von E-Learning: Eine Auseinandersetzung mit dem Technologieakzeptanzmodell zur Analyse individueller und sozialer Einflussfaktoren. Doctoral dissertation, Jena, Univ., Diss., 2010.

Ong, C. W., Woods, D. W., Franklin, M. E., Saunders, S. M., Neal-Barnett, A. M., Compton, S. N., & Twohig, M. P. (2023). The role of psychological flexibility in acceptance-enhanced behavior therapy for trichotillomania: Moderation and mediation findings. Behaviour research and therapy, 164, 104302.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2023.104302

Opoku, M. O., Francis, E. K. (2019). Relevance of the technology acceptance model (TAM) in information management research: a review of selected empirical evidence. Research Journal of Business Management, 7(1), 34-44.

http://dx.doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2020.1186

Orvis, K. A., Horn, D. B., & Belanich, J. (2009). An examination of the role individual differences play in videogame–based training. Military Psychology, 21(4), 461-481.
https://doi.org/10.1080/08995600903206412

Ozili, P. K. (2025). Technology impact model: a transition from the technology acceptance model. AI & SOCIETY, 40(2), 1-3.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01896-1

Paruzel, A., Bentler, D., Schlicher, K. D., Nettelstroth, W., Maier, G. W. (2020). Employees first, technology second: implementation of smart glasses in a manufacturing company. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 64(1), 46-57.
https://doi.org/10.1026/0932-4089/a000292

Previtali, F., & Spedale, S. (2021). Doing age in the workplace: Exploring age categorisation in performance appraisal. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, 100981.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100981

Rahimi, B., Nadri, H., Afshar, H. L., & Timpka, T. (2018). A systematic review of the technology acceptance model in health informatics. Applied Clinical Informatics, 9(03), 604-634.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1668091

Rosenberg, B. D., & Siegel, J. T. (2023). Threatening uncertainty and psychological reactance: are freedom threats always noxious?. Current Psychology, 42(5), 3968-3977.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01640-8

Rosli, M. S., Saleh, N. S., Md. Ali, A., Abu Bakar, S., & Mohd Tahir, L. (2022). A systematic review of the technology acceptance model for the sustainability of higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic and identified research gaps. Sustainability, 14(18), 11389.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811389

Schorr, A. (2019). Pipped at the post: Knowledge gaps and expected low parental IT competence ratings affect young women’ s awakening interest in professional careers in information science. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 968.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00968

Schorr, A. (2020). Skala zur Erfassung der Digitalen Technologieakzeptanz – Weiterentwicklung zum testtheoretisch geprüften Instrument. Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft (Ed.) Digitaler Wandel, Digitale Arbeit, Digitaler Mensch? Dokumentation des 66. Arbeitswissenschaftlichen Kongresses, 35, B.20.5, pp. 1-6.

Schorr, A. (2023). The technology acceptance model (TAM) and its importance for digitalization research: a review. In J. Vogt & N. Gerber (Eds.). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Technikpsychologie, pp. 55-65.

https://doi.org/10.2478/9788366675896-005

Siderska, J., Moh’ d Alsqour, & Alsaqoor, S. (2023). Employees’ attitudes towards implementing robotic process automation technology at service companies. Human Technology, 19(1), 23-40. 

https://doi.org/1014254/1795-6889.2023.19-1.3

Tang, J., & Martins, J. T. (2021). Intergenerational workplace knowledge sharing: challenges and new directions. Journal of Documentation, 77(3), 722-742.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-08-2020-0129

Tang, K. Y., & Hsiao, C. H. (2016). The literature development of technology acceptance model. International Journal of Conceptions on Management and Social Sciences, 4(1), 1-4.

Teo, T., Lee, C. B., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Understanding pre‐service teachers’ computer attitudes: applying and extending the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 128-143.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00247.x

Teo, T., Ursavaş, Ö. F., & Bahçekapili, E. (2011). Efficiency of the technology acceptance model to explain pre‐service teachers’ intention to use technology: A Turkish study. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 28(2), 93-101.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650741111117798

Torraco, R. J., & Lundgren, H. (2020). What HRD is doing—What HRD should be doing: The case for transforming HRD. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 39-65.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484319877058

Upham, P., Oltra, C., & Boso, À. (2015). Towards a cross-paradigmatic framework of the social acceptance of energy systems. Energy Research & Social Science, 8, 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2015.05.003

Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C.-H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195-1229. 

https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Wojnarowska, A., Kobylinska, D., & Lewczuk, K. (2020). Acceptance as an emotion regulation strategy in experimental psychological research: What we know and how we can improve that knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 514899.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00242

Woźniak-Jęchorek, B., Rydzak, W., & Kuźmar, S. (2023). Decoding the interface: Exploring women’s perspectives on integrating AI in professional work. Human Technology, 19(3), 325-351. 

https://doi.org/10.14254/1795-889.2023.19-3.2

Xie, H., Fang, Y., Wang, M., Liu, J., & Lv, A. (2023). Providing digital technology training as a way to retain older workers: The importance of perceived usefulness and growth need. Work, Aging and Retirement, 9(4), 376-392.

https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waad004

Zacher, H., Kooij, D. T., & Beier, M. E. (2018). Active aging at work: Contributing factors and implications for organizations. Organizational Dynamics, 47(1), 37-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.08.001