
TOTAL VIEWS: 653
Over the past forty years, the study of literary classics within literary theory has been continuously deepened and has achieved notable results. This paper examines the journal Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, one of the most important platforms for Chinese scholarship in this field, in order to analyze how research on the concept of the literary classic has developed in China during the last forty years. The study traces this process through three stages: from the 1980s to the 1990s, the first decade of the 21st century, and the period after 2010. By adopting a diachronic perspective, the paper aims to show the distinctive features of each stage while also revealing their internal connections. On this basis, three major approaches to the study of the classic can be identified: the study of the classic status of literary works, the study of canonization processes, and the study of theories of the classic. Finally, through both diachronic observation and typological analysis, the paper outlines the present state of research on the literary classic and offers a brief conclusion and outlook, with the hope of providing new perspectives for future studies of canon formation.
Literary classic; Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art; Current state of research; research prospects
Dadui, Y. (2020). Nobel Prize for Literature and the making of world literature. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, (4), 131-138.
Dongfeng, T. (1995). The fate of the cultural classic in modern China. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, (3), 33-38.
Gan, W. (1989). It is inadvisable to use the consciousness of the classic in evaluating contemporary works. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, (4), 95.
Guohua, Z. (2006). The possibility of literary canonization. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, (2), 44-51.
Hongchang, S. (1980). How Marxist classical writers viewed imaginative thinking. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, (2), 101-107.
Hua, Y. (2020). Playful reception of classics: On parodization of Du Fu’s poems in the Song Dynasty. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, (2), 112-120.
Jue, C. (2023). Du Fu: The Song Dynasty making of China’s greatest poet. Brill.
Liang, D. (2022). The canonization of Gui Youguang’s Shouxu and its significance in literary history. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, (4), 144-152.
Liqun, Q., & Mian, X. (1996). An anthology of twentieth-century Chinese literature. Peking University Press.
Lizhe, X. (2022). The criticism of Fortress Besieged between 1946 and 1949 and its significance in the history of modern Chinese literature. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, (1), 125-133.
Ning, W. (2008). Misreading and the revision and reconstruction of the literary canon: A re-examination of Harold Bloom’s revisionist critical theory. Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art, (2), 16-23.
Qingben, L., & Duo, D. (2024). Validity in intercultural interpretation of romanticism: A case study of Qu Yuan’s Lisao. Cowrie: Comparative and World Literature, 1(2), 211-226.
Qinghua, Z. (2025). The canonization of literature in the new century. Contemporary Writers Review, (4), 11-15.
Wang, D. D. (2015). The lyrical in epic time: Modern Chinese intellectuals and artists through the 1949 crisis. Columbia University Press.
Research on Literary Classics in China over the Past Forty Years: An Analysis Based on the Journal Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art
How to cite this paper: Ziwei Teng. (2025) Research on Literary Classics in China over the Past Forty Years: An Analysis Based on the Journal Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art. Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Science, 9(9), 1721-1725.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/jhass.2025.09.005