Keywords

Large language models; L2 writing; written corrective feedback; homogenization; interlanguage; human-AI interaction

References

Agarwal, D., Naaman, M., & Vashistha, A. (2025). AI suggestions homogenize writing toward Western styles and diminish cultural nuances. In Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3713564

Anderson, B. R., Shah, J. H., & Kreminski, M. (2024). Homogenization effects of large language models on human creative ideation. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Creativity & Cognition (pp. 413-425). Association for Computing Machinery.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3635636.3656204

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten-month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193-214.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp016

Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learner’s errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(1-4), 161-170.
https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97-107. 

https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023

Ferris, D. R. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press.

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101.

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399

IELTS. (2023, May 3). IELTS writing band descriptors and key assessment criteria. 

https://ielts.org/news-and-insights/ielts-writing-band-descriptors-and-key-assessment-criteria

Jaccard, P. (1901). Distribution de la flore alpine dans le Bassin des Dranses et dans quelques régions voisines. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise des Sciences Naturelles, 37, 241-272.

Moon, K., Green, A. E., & Kushlev, K. (2025). Homogenizing effect of large language models (LLMs) on creative diver-sity: An empirical comparison of human and ChatGPT writing. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 6, 100207.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100207

Narreddy, C., Joordens, S., & Prompiengchai, S. (2025). Harnessing large language models for scalable and effective formative assessment in higher education: A review. Trends in Higher Education, 4(4), Article 65. 

https://doi.org/10.3390/higheredu4040065

Niwattanakul, S., Singthongchai, J., Naenudorn, E., & Wanapu, S. (2013). Using of Jaccard coefficient for keywords similarity. Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, 1, 380-384.

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129-158.

https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129

Seddiki, M., & Korichi, S. (2026). The AI paradox in L2 writing: Why helpful feedback creates unhelpful dependency in higher education. Research Square.
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8731897/v2

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(1-4), 209-231.

https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209

Sourati, Z., Ziabari, A. S., & Dehghani, M. (2026). The homogenizing effect of large language models on human expression and thought. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Advance online publication. 

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2026.01.003

Sung, H., Csuros, K., & Sung, M.-C. (2025). Comparing human and LLM proofreading in L2 writing: Impact on lexical and syntactic features. In Proceedings of the 20th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications (BEA 2025) (pp. 11-23). Association for Computational Linguistics. 

https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.bea-1.2

Wang, J. (2025). EDCEW-LLM: Error detection and correction in English writing: A large language model-based ap-proach. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 129, 1153-1164.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2025.08.005

Weidlich, J., Gotsch, F., Schudel, K., Marusic-Würscher, C., Mazzarella, J., Bolten, H., Bütler, D., Luger, S., Wohlfender, B., & Maag Merki, K. (2025). Teacher, peer, or AI? Comparing effects of feedback sources in higher education. Computers and Education Open, 9, Article 100300.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2025.100300

Wenger, E., & Kenett, Y. N. (2026). Large language models are homogeneously creative. PNAS Nexus, 5(3), pgag042.

https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag042

Yan, D., & Zhang, S. (2024). L2 writer engagement with automated written corrective feedback provided by ChatGPT: A mixed-method multiple case study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 1143.

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03543-y

Zhang, T., Kishore, V., Wu, F., Weinberger, K. Q., & Artzi, Y. (2020). BERTScore: Evaluating text generation with BERT. In the International Conference on Learning Representations.
https://openreview.net/forum?id=SkeHuCVFDr