JSFA

Article http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijfsa.2026.09.010

Assessment of Coffee Production and Marketing in Guji and West Guji Zones, Southern Oromia

TOTAL VIEWS: 337

Tekle Bobo Tolassa

Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Bore Agricultural Research Center, Bore, P.O.Box 21, Ethiopia.

*Corresponding author: Tekle Bobo Tolassa

Published: September 29,2026

Abstract

This study examines coffee production and marketing systems in the Guji and West Guji zones of southern Oromia, Ethiopia, with a focus on market structure, conduct, performance, and associated constraints. Primary data were collected from 245 coffee producers and 20 traders using a multi-stage sampling technique, complemented by key informant interviews and focus group discussions. Descriptive statistics and the Structure–Conduct–Performance (SCP) framework were employed for analysis. Results indicate that coffee production is a major livelihood activity, with an average land allocation of 3.5 hectares and productivity of 8.55 quintals per hectare, exceeding the national average. However, production is dominated by local varieties (95.5%), with limited adoption of improved technologies, indicating less attention to research and development in improving coffee production and productivity through the collection or introduction of improved coffee varieties that can outperform the varieties in the hands of the farmers. The coffee market is characterized by multiple intermediaries and five dominant marketing channels, where cooperatives and processors account for the largest share of 65%, 57.4%, and 34.5% of marketed surplus. Market performance analysis reveals that producers receive a relatively low share (32.9%-44.7%) of the final consumer price, indicating inefficiencies and unequal margin distribution. Major production constraints include disease prevalence, limited access to improved varieties, and weak extension services, while marketing is hindered by low prices, poor infrastructure, and limited market access. The study underscores the need for technological, institutional, and market reforms to enhance productivity and improve producers’ market participation in the study area.

Keywords

Coffee production; Guji zone; market structure; conduct; performance

References

[1] Moat J, Williams J, Baena S, Wilkinson T, Gole TW, Challa ZK, et al. Resilience potential of the Ethiopian coffee sector under climate change. Nat Plants. 2017;3(7):1-14.

[2] Wang KH, Su CW, Tao R, Hao LN. Are there periodically collapsing bubble behaviours in the global coffee market? Agrekon. 2020;59(1):65-77.

[3] Husen A. Factors affecting coffee marketing activities: The case of Oromia Coffee Farmers Cooperative Union, Gelan town, Oromiya Regional State, Ethiopia [doctoral dissertation]. Ambo: Ambo University; 2022.

[4] Amamo A. Coffee production and marketing in Ethiopia. Eur J Bus Manag. 2015;37:109-22.

[5] Tekle Bobo Tolassa, Tesfaye Abera, Jema Haji. Macroeconomic determinants of coffee price volatility in Ethiopia: Application of GARCH-MIDAS model [doctoral dissertation]. Haramaya: Haramaya University; 2019.

[6] Zerssa G, Feyssa D, Kim DG, Eichler-Löbermann B. Challenges of smallholder farming in Ethiopia and opportunities by adopting climate-smart agriculture. Agriculture. 2021;11(3):19.

[7] Mendoza G. A primer on marketing channels and margins. Lyme: Lyme Rimer Publishers Inc; 1995.

[8] Hailu A, Wako K. Analysis of Arabica coffee production trend and major production constraints in east and west Hararghe zones, Ethiopia. J Coffee Sustain. 2024;1(3):129-45.

[9] Teshome. Market chain analysis of red pepper: The case of Boke Woreda, West Hararghe Zone, Oromia National Regional State of Ethiopia [doctoral dissertation]. Haramaya: Haramaya University; 2024.

How to cite this paper

Assessment of Coffee Production and Marketing in Guji and West Guji Zones, Southern Oromia

How to cite this paper: Tekle Bobo Tolassa. (2026) Assessment of Coffee Production and Marketing in Guji and West Guji Zones, Southern Oromia. International Journal of Food Science and Agriculture, 10(3), 282-292.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26855/ijfsa.2026.09.010